...
首页> 外文期刊>HortTechnology >Evaluation of Selected Fine-leaf Fescue Cultivars for Their Turfgrass Quality and Weed Suppressive Ability in Field Settings.
【24h】

Evaluation of Selected Fine-leaf Fescue Cultivars for Their Turfgrass Quality and Weed Suppressive Ability in Field Settings.

机译:在田间环境中评估精选的细叶羊茅草皮质量和杂草抑制能力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A series of field studies were conducted from 1999 to 2005 in Ithaca, NY, at the Cornell Turfgrass Research Center as part of the National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) to evaluate a collection of 78 fine-leaf fescue cultivars (Festuca spp.) for turfgrass quality, seedling vigor, and ability to inhibit the establishment of common annual and perennial weeds. Using these criteria, we evaluated the overall suitability of the cultivars for use in turfgrass settings, as well as their potential weed suppressive or allelopathic ability. The ability of fine-leaf fescue to displace weeds was visually evaluated by density-wise comparison, and several cultivars of the 78 studied consistently established well and provided good to very good suppression (greater than 70%) of common turf weeds when established at the same planting density. Other cultivars provided moderate (between 35% and 70%) to (< 30%) little weed suppression. Greater weed suppressivity is likely associated with the differential ability of fescue cultivars to establish rapidly and to form a dense canopy, as well as potential allelopathic interference. This study was conducted in conjunction with laboratory experiments that revealed that certain fine-leaf fescue cultivars produced phytotoxic root exudates that were released into the rhizosphere over time. Additional field studies conducted in Ithaca showed that cultivars Intrigue, Columbra, and Sandpiper were consistently more weed suppressive than the other fine-leaf fescues evaluated. Although our understanding of the dynamics of production and degradation of fine-leaf fescue root exudates in the rhizosphere is limited, recent field studies also suggest that allelopathic interference as well as the ability to rapidly establish influence subsequent weed infestation in fine-leaf fescue stands. From a more practical standpoint, certain fine-leaf fescue cultivars, including Intrigue, Columbra, Sandpiper, and Reliant II, could be recommended for use in low-maintenance turf settings in the northeastern United States due to their aesthetic appeal and their limited weed infestation in circumstances where herbicides are not applied.
机译:1999年至2005年,作为国家草皮草评估计划(NTEP)的一部分,在纽约州康奈尔草皮草研究中心进行了一系列田间研究,以评估78种细叶羊茅(Festuca spp。)草坪草的质量,幼苗活力以及抑制常见一年生和多年生杂草生长的能力。使用这些标准,我们评估了该品种在草皮环境中使用的总体适用性,以及它们潜在的抑制杂草或化感能力。通过密度比较直观地评估了细叶羊茅驱除杂草的能力,研究的78个品种中的几个品种始终保持良好状态,并在开垦时对普通草皮杂草提供了很好的抑制效果(大于70%)。相同的种植密度。其他品种对杂草的抑制作用中等(在35%至70%之间)至(<30%)。较高的杂草抑制能力可能与羊茅品种快速建立和形成致密冠层的差异能力以及潜在的化感作用有关。这项研究是结合实验室实验进行的,该实验表明某些细叶羊茅栽培品种产生的植物毒性根系分泌物会随时间释放到根际中。在伊萨卡(Ithaca)进行的其他田间研究表明,与评估的其他细叶羊茅相比,Intrigue,Columbra和Sandpiper品种对杂草的抑制作用始终较弱。尽管我们对根际上细叶羊茅根系分泌物的产生和降解动力学的理解是有限的,但最近的田间研究也表明,化感作用以及快速建立影响细叶羊茅根系随后杂草侵染的能力。从更实际的角度来看,由于其美学吸引力和杂草侵扰有限,某些低叶羊茅品种,包括Intrigue,Columbra,Sandpiper和Reliant II,可推荐用于低维护性草坪环境中。在不使用除草剂的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号