...
首页> 外文期刊>HortTechnology >The Landscape Performance of Annual Bedding Plants Grown in Pine Tree Substrate
【24h】

The Landscape Performance of Annual Bedding Plants Grown in Pine Tree Substrate

机译:松树基质中一年生垫层植物的景观表现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The objective of this study was to evaluate the landscape performance of annual bedding plants grown in a ground pine tree substrate (PTS) produced from loblolly pine trees (Pinus taeda) or in ground pine bark (PB) when transplanted into the landscape and grown at three different fertilizer rates. Begonia (Begonia xsemperflorens-cultorum) 'Cocktail Vodka', coleus (Solenostemen scutellarioides) 'Kingswood Torch', impatiens (Impatiens walleriana) 'Dazzler White', marigold (Tagetes erecta) 'Bonanza Yellow', petunia (Petunia xhybrid) 'Wave Purple', salvia (Salvia splendens) 'Red Hot Sally', and vinca (Catharanthus roseus) 'Cooler Pink' were evaluated in 2005, and begonia 'Cocktail Whiskey', marigold 'Inca Gold', salvia 'Red Hot Sally', and vinca 'Cooler Pink' were evaluated in 2006 and 2007. Landscape fertilizer rates were 1 lb/1000 ft(2) nitrogen (N) in 2005 and 0, 1, and 2 lb/1000 ft2 N in 2006 and 2007. Visual observations throughout each year indicated that all species, whether grown in PTS or PB, had comparable foliage quality in the landscape trial beds during the growing period. With few exceptions, dry weight and plant size for all species increased with increasing fertilizer additions, regardless of the substrate in which the plants were grown. For the unfertilized treatment, when comparing plant dry weight between PB and PTS for each species and for each year (eight comparisons), PTS-grown plant dry weight was less than PB-grown plants in three out of the eight comparisons. However, there were fewer differences in plant dry weight between PTS- and PB-grown plants when fertilizer was applied (PTS-grown plants were smaller than PB-grown plants in only 2 of the 16 comparisons: four species, two fertilizer rates, and 2 years), indicating that N immobilization may be somewhat of an issue, but not to the extent expected. Therefore, the utilization of PTS as a substrate for the production of landscape annuals may be acceptable in the context of landscape performance.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估从火炬松树(Pinus taeda)或地松树皮(PB)移植到景观中并生长于地上的松树树基质(PTS)或地松树皮(PB)中生长的一年生被褥植物的景观性能。三种不同的肥料用量。秋海棠(Begonia xsemperflorens-cultorum)'Cocktail Vodka',锦紫苏(Solenostemen scutellarioides)'Kingswood Torch',impatiens(Impatiens walleriana)'Dazzler White',万寿菊(Tagetes erecta)'Bonanza Yellow',矮牵牛(Petunia) ',丹参(Salvia splendens)'Red Hot Sally'和长春蔓(Catharanthus roseus)'Cooler Pink'在2005年进行了评估,秋海棠“鸡尾酒威士忌”,万寿菊“ Inca Gold”,丹参“ Red Hot Sally”和vinca “ Cooler Pink”在2006年和2007年进行了评估。景观肥料的施用量在2005年为1 lb / 1000 ft(2)氮(N),在2006年和2007年为0、1、2 lb / 1000 ft2N。一年的时间表明,无论是在PTS还是PB上生长的所有物种,在生长期的景观试验床上都具有相当的叶子质量。除少数例外,所有植物的干重和植物大小都随着肥料添加量的增加而增加,而与植物生长的基质无关。对于未受精处理,在比较每个物种和每年的PB和PTS之间的植物干重时(八次比较),在八次比较中,有3处PTS生长的植物干重小于PB生长的植物。但是,施用肥料时,PTS和PB种植的植物之间的干重差异较小(在16个比较中,只有2个中PTS种植的植物小于PB种植的植物:四种,两种肥料比率和2年),这表明固氮可能是一个问题,但没有达到预期的程度。因此,在景观表现的背景下,将PTS用作景观年鉴的生产基质是可以接受的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号