...
首页> 外文期刊>BioNanoscience >Nanophotonic Biosensor Technologies for Lab on Chip Applications--a Focus Article on Optical Biosensors from Three EC Lab on Chip Projects with a Comparison to the State of Art
【24h】

Nanophotonic Biosensor Technologies for Lab on Chip Applications--a Focus Article on Optical Biosensors from Three EC Lab on Chip Projects with a Comparison to the State of Art

机译:用于芯片实验室应用的纳米光子生物传感器技术-来自三个EC芯片实验室项目的光学生物传感器的重点文章,并与现有技术进行了比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper compares the performances of various nanophotonic biosensors developed in three recent European Lab-on-Chip collaborations: SABIO, INTOPSENS and POSITIVE. These are attractive for biosensing due to their small footprint, high Q-factors and compatibility with on-chip optics and microfluidics enabling integrated sensor arrays for compact lab-on-chip (LOC) applications. Many applications typically require the addressing of a number of issues including: improving limit of detection, managing the influence of temperature, parallelization of the measurement for higher throughput and on-chip referencing, efficient light-coupling strategies to simplify alignment, and packaging of the nanophotonics chip and integration with microfluidics. For ring resonator-based sensors, volumetric sensitivities of 246 nm/RIU and 2169 nm/RIU and limits of detection of 5 × 10~(-6) RIU and 8.3 × 10~(-6) RIU were reported from SABIO (at 1.3 μm) and INTOPSENS (at 1.5 μm), respectively. For SABIO, this was for an eight-channel Si_3N_4 slot-waveguide ring resonator sensor array whilst for INTOPSENS this was for an individual Si Vernier cascade sensor. In POSITIVE for porous alumina-based membrane sensors, a volumetric limit of detection (LOD) was reported at 5 × 10~(-6) RIU but more importantly, in contrast to the sensors from the other two projects, the standard deviation of the measured values was below 5 %, sensing response times were fast and small sample volumes could be used (<100 μl). For biosensing within SABIO, a surface limit of detection of 0.9 pg/mm~2 for anti-BSA on a gluteraldehyde-covered surface was recorded corresponding to a 125 ng/ml anti-BSA solution, whilst Si slot-waveguide ring resonators have reported 2 pg/mm~2 and 10 ng/ml for biotin on a streptavidin-coated surface. In contrast, in POSITIVE, for an assay of β-lactoglobulin-anti-β-lactoglobulin-anti-rabbit-IgG-streptavidin-conjugated CdSe quantum dots, a noise floor for individual measurements of 3.7 ng/ml (25 pM) was obtained, with an overall statistical, or formal assay LOD of 33.7 ng/ml (225 pM), for total assay times of under 1 h. With similar volumetric limits of detection, the sensors are still poorer than that of the state of art in nanophotonic sensors; however, the POSITIVE device compared favourably to it at least for total assay times, response times and minimum volumes of analyte necessary.
机译:本文比较了三个最近的欧洲芯片实验室合作中开发的各种纳米光子生物传感器的性能:SABIO,INTOPSENS和POSITIVE。由于它们的占位面积小,高Q因子以及与片上光学器件和微流体的兼容性,因此它们对于生物传感具有吸引力,从而使集成传感器阵列适用于紧凑的片上实验室(LOC)应用。许多应用通常需要解决许多问题,包括:改善检测极限,管理温度的影响,实现更高吞吐量的测量并行化和片上参考,有效的光耦合策略以简化对准以及封装纳米光子学芯片以及与微流体的集成。对于基于环形谐振器的传感器,SABIO报道了246 nm / RIU和2169 nm / RIU的体积灵敏度以及5×10〜(-6)RIU和8.3×10〜(-6)RIU的检出限(1.3 (μm)和INTOPSENS(1.5μm)。对于SABIO,这是用于八通道Si_3N_4缝隙波导环形谐振器传感器阵列,而对于INTOPSENS,这是用于单个Si Vernier级联传感器。在多孔氧化铝基膜传感器的POSITIVE中,报告的检测限(LOD)为5×10〜(-6)RIU,但更重要的是,与其他两个项目的传感器相比,测量值低于5%,感测响应时间很快,可以使用小样品量(<100μl)。为了在SABIO中进行生物传感,记录了戊二醛覆盖的表面上抗BSA的检测极限为pg / mm〜0.9 pg / mm〜2,对应于125 ng / ml的抗BSA溶液,而硅缝隙波导环形谐振器已有报道链霉亲和素涂层表面上的生物素为2 pg / mm〜2和10 ng / ml。相反,在积极的情况下,对于β-乳球蛋白-抗-β-乳球蛋白-抗兔-IgG-链霉抗生物素蛋白缀合的CdSe量子点的测定,本底测量的本底噪声为3.7 ng / ml(25 pM) ,总体统计或正式测定LOD为33.7 ng / ml(225 pM),总测定时间少于1小时。在具有相似的检测体积极限的情况下,该传感器仍然比纳米光子传感器中的现有技术要差。但是,至少在总的测定时间,响应时间和所需的最小分析物体积方面,积极型设备优于它。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号