...
首页> 外文期刊>Traffic Injury Prevention >Front versus Rear Seat Injury Risk for Child Passengers: Evaluation of Newer Model Year Vehicles
【24h】

Front versus Rear Seat Injury Risk for Child Passengers: Evaluation of Newer Model Year Vehicles

机译:儿童乘客的前座和后座伤害风险:较新型号的年度车辆评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: Design improvements to frontal air bags for vehicles of model year 1998 and newer have reduced the risk of injury to child occupants exposed to their deployment. These changes in conjunction with other improvements in the protection of front seat occupants give impetus for the reconsideration of rear seating recommendations for child occupants. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the association between seating row (front vs. rear) and risk of injury to children in newer model year vehicles. Methods: Data was collected on child occupants from December 1, 1998, to November 30, 2007, via insurance claim records and a validated telephone survey. The study sample included child occupants aged 0 to 15 years seated in the front and rear rows of vehicles model year 1998 or newer, involved in a crash in sixteen states. Children were classified as injured if a parent or driver reported an injury corresponding with Abbreviated Injury Scale scores of ≥2. The age-specific relative risk of injury by seat row was calculated for the whole data set and then further stratified by model year. Results: Complete interview data were obtained on 10,670 crashes involving 16,920 children, representing an estimated 205,408 crashes with 314,968 child passengers in the study population. The adjusted relative risk of injury to children in the rear seat compared to those in the front was 0.36 (0.23-0.57) and 0.69 (0.49-0.98) for 0- to 8-year-olds and 9- to 12-year-olds, respectively. For 13- to 15-year-olds, the reduced injury risk associated with rear row seating narrowly missed statistical significance. When stratified by model year (1998 to 2002 and 2003+), all age group/model year combinations demonstrated a crude rear row injury risk that was lower than that of the front row. Conclusions: This analysis, conducted on a set of vehicles with advanced front seat safety systems including second-generation and newer air bags, strongly confirmed the recommendation that all children 0-12 years should be seated in the rear row(s) of their vehicles. Children in the rear row(s) were one half to two thirds as likely to sustain injury than those in the front after adjusting for potentially confounding crash, vehicle, and child factors.
机译:目标:1998年及以后的车型的前部安全气囊的设计改进减少了暴露于展开状态的儿童乘员受伤的风险。这些变化与对前座乘员保护的其他改进相结合,为重新考虑为儿童乘员提供后座建议提供了动力。因此,这项研究的目的是评估座椅排(前排与后排)与较新型号车辆中儿童受伤风险之间的关联。方法:通过保险理赔记录和经过验证的电话调查,收集了1998年12月1日至2007年11月30日儿童居住者的数据。该研究样本包括年龄在0至15岁的儿童乘员,他们坐在1998年及以后的模型的前排和后排车辆中,涉及16个州的撞车事故。如果父母或驾驶员报告的伤害与缩写伤害量表分数≥2相对应,则将儿童分类为伤害。针对整个数据集计算了按座位排的特定年龄段的相对伤害风险,然后按模型年份进一步分层。结果:获得了完整的访谈数据,涉及10,670起撞车事件,涉及16,920名儿童,这代表研究人群中估计有205,408起撞车事故,其中314,968名儿童乘客。与前排座椅相比,后排座椅对儿童的伤害校正后相对危险度为0至8岁和9至12岁的儿童分别为0.36(0.23-0.57)和0.69(0.49-0.98)。 , 分别。对于13至15岁的儿童,与后排座椅相关的受伤风险降低没有统计学意义。当按车型年(1998年至2002年和2003+年)进行分层时,所有年龄组/车型年组合均显示出后排粗伤的危险性低于前排。结论:此分析是对一组具有先进前排座椅安全系统(包括第二代和较新的安全气囊)的车辆进行的,强烈证实了以下建议:所有0至12岁的儿童应坐在其车辆的后排。在调整了潜在的混杂事故,车辆和儿童因素之后,后排的儿童受伤的可能性是前排的三分之一至三分之二。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号