...
首页> 外文期刊>Traffic Injury Prevention >Could Driving Safety be Compromised by Noise Exposure at Work and Noise-Induced Hearing Loss?
【24h】

Could Driving Safety be Compromised by Noise Exposure at Work and Noise-Induced Hearing Loss?

机译:工作中的噪声暴露和噪声引起的听力损失会损害驾驶安全吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective. A study was conducted to verify if there is an association between occupational noise exposure, noise-induced hearing loss and driving safety expanding on previous findings by Picard, et al. (2008) that the two factors did increase accident risk in the workplace. Methods. This study was made possible when driving records of all Quebec drivers were made available by the Societe de l'assurance automobile du Quebec (SAAQ is the state monopoly responsible for the provision of motor vehicle insurance and the compensation of victims of traffic accidents). These records were linked with personal records maintained by the Quebec National Institute of Public Health as part of its mission to prevent noise induced hearing loss in the workplace. Individualized information on occupational noise exposure and hearing sensitivity was available for 46,030 male workers employed in noisy industries who also held a valid driver's permit. The observation period is of five years duration, starting with the most recent audiometric examination. The associations between occupational noise exposure levels, hearing status, and personal driving record were examined by log-binomial regression on data adjusted for age and duration of exposure. Daily noise exposures and bilateral average hearing threshold levels at 3, 4, and 6 kHz were used as independent variables while the dependent variables were 1) the number of motor vehicle accidents experienced by participants during the study period and 2) participants' records of registered traffic violations of the highway safety code. The findings are reported as prevalence ratios (PRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Attributable numbers of events were computed with the relevant PRs, lesser-noise, exposed workers and those with normal hearing levels making the group of reference. Results. Adjusting for age confirmed that experienced workers had fewer traffic accidents. The data show that occupational noise exposure and hearing loss have the same effect on driving safety record than that reported on the risk of accident in noisy industrial settings. Specifically, the risk of traffic accident (PR = 1.07 (CI 95% [1.01; 1.15]) is significantly associated with the daily occupational noise exposures ≥100 dBA. For participants having a bilateral average hearing loss ranging from 16 to 30 dB, the PR of traffic accident is 1.06 (CI 95% [1.01; 1.11]) and reaches 1.31 (CI 95% [1.2; 1.42]) when the hearing loss exceeds of 50 dB. A reduction in the number of speeding violations occurred among workers occupationally exposed to noise levels ≥90 dBA and those with noise-induced hearing loss ≥16 dB. By contrast, the same individuals had an increase in other violations of the Highway safety code. This suggests that noise-exposed workers might be less vigilant to other traffic hazards. Conclusion. Daily occupational noise exposures ≥100 dBA and noise-induced hearing losses-even when just barely Noticeable-may interfere with the safe operation of motor vehicles.
机译:目的。根据Picard等人的先前发现,进行了一项研究以验证职业噪声暴露,噪声引起的听力损失与驾驶安全性之间是否存在关联。 (2008年),这两个因素确实增加了工作场所的事故风险。方法。当魁北克兴业银行提供所有魁北克司机的驾驶记录时,这项研究便成为可能(SAAQ是负责提供机动车保险和交通事故受害者赔偿的州专营公司)。这些记录与魁北克国家公共卫生学院保存的个人记录相关联,这是其任务的一部分,目的是防止工作场所因噪音引起的听力损失。有46,030名在嘈杂行业工作的男性工人可以获得职业噪声暴露和听力敏感性的个性化信息,这些工人还持有有效的驾驶执照。观察期为五年,从最近的听力检查开始。通过对数年龄和暴露时间调整后的数据进行对数二项回归,检验了职业噪声暴露水平,听力状态和个人驾驶记录之间的关联。每天的噪声暴露量和在3、4和6 kHz处的双边平均听力阈值水平用作自变量,而因变量是1)研究期间参与者经历的机动车事故数量和2)参与者的注册记录交通违反高速公路安全守则。调查结果以其95%置信区间(CI)的患病率(PR)报告。归因于事件的数量是通过相关的PR,噪声较小,暴露的工人以及听力正常的人作为参考组来计算的。结果。调整年龄后,有经验的工人交通事故减少了。数据表明,职业噪声暴露和听力损失对行车安全记录的影响与在嘈杂的工业环境中报告事故风险的影响相同。具体而言,交通事故风险(PR = 1.07(CI 95%[1.01; 1.15])与每日职业噪声暴露≥100dBA显着相关。对于双侧平均听力损失范围为16至30 dB的参与者,交通事故的PR为1.06(CI 95%[1.01; 1.11]),并在听力损失超过50 dB时达到1.31(CI 95%[1.2; 1.42])。暴露于噪声水平≥90 dBA且噪声引起的听力损失≥16 dB的人群中,相比之下,同一个人在违反高速公路安全法规方面的其他违法行为有所增加,这表明受噪声影响的工人对其他人群的警惕性较低。结论:每天的职业噪声暴露≥100dBA和噪声引起的听力损失,即使只是一点点注意,也可能会干扰机动车的安全运行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号