...
首页> 外文期刊>Traffic Injury Prevention >Seat Design Principles to Reduce Neck Injuries in Rear Impacts
【24h】

Seat Design Principles to Reduce Neck Injuries in Rear Impacts

机译:减少后部撞击中颈部伤害的座椅设计原则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives: In the 1990s, research was conducted at General Motors R&D Center on seat safety in rear impacts. It led to the development of high retention seats and an active head restraint to improve occupant safety. This article provides an overview of the design principles found from that research and focuses on seat characteristics that lower whiplash risks. Methods: Sled and quasistatic seat testing showed how occupants interact with the seat in rear impacts and what seat characteristics improve occupant retention, energy management, and support of the head-neck, lowering injury risks. Neck displacements, moments, and forces were used to assess whiplash and more severe injury risks. A QST test was developed to quasi-statically push a dummy rearward into the seat to determine seat stiffness (k), frame strength (j), and peak bending moment (M{sub}Hpt). These parameters were related to neck displacements associated with whiplash. Sled tests were run with in-position and out-of-position male and female Hybrid III dummies to assess performance. A high retention seat and active head restraint were developed and put into production in 1997. Results: High retention seats have 2.3 times greater moment, develop 2.2 times greater load, but have the same stiffness as earlier yielding seats. Seat stiffness was found to be a principle characteristic related to neck displacements associated with whiplash. The combination of a stronger frame, yielding seatback, and high-forward head restraint in the high retention seat provides early head support and low neck displacements in rear impacts. Larger reductions in neck displacement were obtained by adding an active head restraint that moves the head restraint forward and upward by occupant penetration into the seatback. This substantially reduces head contact time, neck displacements, and loads. Conclusions: Whiplash risks are related to seat stiffness, the position of the head restraint, and frame strength. Low seat stiffness allows the occupant to move into the seatback without high loads on the torso until the head-neck is supported by the head restraint. A strong seat frame reduces early seatback rotation that increases the gap to the head restraint and drops it in relation to the occupant's head. A high and forward head restraint provides support of the head and neck. Large forces can be applied to the occupant once the head, neck, and torso are supported by the seat and head restraint without adverse loading of the spine. The addition of an active head restraint closes the gap behind the head before significant load develops on the neck. The movement provides a more upward trajectory of the head restraint. Low-speed rear crashes are not just a matter of whiplash; older occupants, some with cervical stenosis, are at risk for paralyzing spinal cord injury.
机译:目标:1990年代,在通用汽车研发中心进行了关于后撞座椅安全性的研究。这导致了高固定性座椅和主动式头枕的开发,从而提高了乘员的安全性。本文提供了从该研究中发现的设计原理的概述,并着重于降低鞭打风险的座椅特性。方法:雪橇和准静态座椅测试显示了乘员在后部碰撞时如何与座椅相互作用,以及座椅的哪些特性改善了乘员的保持力,能量管理和头颈部支撑,从而降低了受伤风险。颈部的位移,力矩和力用于评估鞭打和更严重的受伤风险。开发了QST测试以将假人准静态地向后推入座椅,以确定座椅刚度(k),车架强度(j)和最大弯矩(M {sub} Hpt)。这些参数与与鞭打有关的颈部位移有关。使用就位和就位的公和母Hybrid III假人进行雪橇测试,以评估性能。高保持力座椅和主动式头枕在1997年开发并投入生产。结果:高保持力座椅的力矩增加了2.3倍,负载增加了2.2倍,但刚度与早期屈服的座椅相同。发现座椅刚度是与鞭打相关的颈部位移有关的主要特征。框架更坚固,座椅靠背更靠背以及高保持位高头部头部保护装置的结合,可提供早期的头部支撑和在向后碰撞时颈部的低位移动。通过增加一个主动式头枕,可以使颈部位移更大程度地降低,该头枕通过乘员向座椅靠背的渗透使头枕向前和向上移动。这大大减少了头部接触时间,颈部位移和负荷。结论:鞭打风险与座椅刚度,头枕位置和车架强度有关。低座椅刚度使乘员可以进入座椅靠背,而不会在躯干上施加高负荷,直到头枕由头枕支撑。坚固的座椅框架可减少早期的座椅靠背旋转,从而增加与头部保护装置的间隙,并使间隙相对于乘员的头部下降。高度向前的头枕可为头部和颈部提供支撑。一旦头部,颈部和躯干受到座椅和头部保护装置的支撑,就可以向乘员施加很大的力,而不会给脊柱带来不利的负荷。附加的主动式头枕可在脖子上产生明显负荷之前关闭头部后方的缝隙。该运动提供了头部保护装置的更向上的轨迹。低速后方碰撞不仅仅是鞭打的问题;年龄较大的乘员(有些患有颈椎狭窄)有麻痹性脊髓损伤的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号