...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of the American Dental Association >Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data
【24h】

Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data

机译:基于口腔内扫描仪数据的计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造的牙科模型的准确性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. Little is known about the accuracy of physical dental casts that are based on three-dimensional (3D) data from an intraoral scanner (IOS). Thus, the authors conducted a study to evaluate the accuracy of full-arch stereolithographic (SLA) and milled casts obtained from scans of three IOSs.Methods. The authors digitized a polyurethane model using a laboratory reference scanner and three IOSs. They sent the scans (n = five scans per IOS) to the manufacturers to produce five physical dental casts and scanned the casts with the reference scanner. Using 3D evaluation software, the authors superimposed the data sets and compared them.Results. The mean trueness values of Lava Chairside Oral Scanner C.O.S. (3M ESPE, St. Paul, Minn.), CEREC AC with Bluecam (Sirona, Bensheim, Germany) and iTero (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif.) casts were 67.50 micrometers (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 63.43-71.56), 75.80 ìm (95 percent CI, 71.74-79.87) and 98.23 ìm (95 percent CI, 94.17-102.30), respectively, with a statistically significant difference among all of the scanners (P < .05). The mean precision values were 13.77 ìm (95 percent CI, 2.76-24.79), 21.62 ìm (95 percent CI, 10.60-32.63) and 48.83 ìm (95 percent CI, 37.82-59.85), respectively, with statistically significant differences between CEREC AC with Bluecam and iTero casts, as well as between Lava Chairside Oral Scanner C.O.S. and iTero casts (P < .05). Conclusion. All of the casts showed an acceptable level of accuracy; however, the SLA-based casts (CEREC AC with Bluecam and Lava Chairside Oral Scanner C.O.S.) seemed to be more accurate than milled casts (iTero).Practical Implications. On the basis of the results of this investigation, the authors suggested that SLA technology was superior for the fabrication of dental casts. Nevertheless, all of the investigated casts showed clinically acceptable accuracy. Clinicians should keep in mind that the highest deviations might occur in the distal areas of the casts.
机译:背景。关于基于口腔内扫描仪(IOS)的三维(3D)数据的物理牙科模型的准确性知之甚少。因此,作者进行了一项研究,以评估从三个IOS扫描获得的全拱形立体光刻(SLA)和铣削铸件的准确性。作者使用实验室参考扫描仪和三个IOS对聚氨酯模型进行了数字化处理。他们将扫描结果发送给制造商(每个IOS,n = 5次扫描),以生产5个物理牙科模型,并使用参考扫描仪对模型进行扫描。作者使用3D评估软件叠加了数据集并进行了比较。 Lava Chairside口腔扫描仪C.O.S.的平均真实度值(3M ESPE,明尼苏达州圣保罗),CEREC AC,Bluecam(西班那州,本斯海姆,德国)和iTero(Align Technology,加利福尼亚州圣何塞)的铸件为67.50微米(95%置信区间[CI],63.43- 71.56),75.80μm(95%CI,71.74-79.87)和98.23μm(95%CI,94.17-102.30),所有扫描仪之间的统计差异显着(P <.05)。平均精确度值分别为13.77微米(95%CI,2.76-24.79),21.62微米(95%CI,10.60-32.63)和48.83微米(95%CI,37.82-59.85),CEREC AC之间的统计差异显着与Bluecam和iTero演员,以及Lava Chairside口腔扫描仪COS之间和iTero投射(P <.05)。结论。所有演员表都显示出可接受的准确性;但是,基于SLA的演员表(CEREC AC和Bluecam和Lava Chairside Oral Scanner C.O.S.)似乎比碾磨的演员表(iTero)更准确。根据这项调查的结果,作者建议SLA技术在制造牙模方面具有优势。然而,所有调查的演员表均显示出临床上可接受的准确性。临床医生应记住,最大的偏差可能发生在铸型的远端区域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号