首页> 外文期刊>The European physical journal, B. Condensed matter physics >Comment on“On the controversy around Daganzo's requiem for and Aw-Rascle's resurrection of second-order traffic flow models”by D. Helbing and A.F. Johansson What faster-than-traffic characteristic speeds mean for vehicular traffic flow
【24h】

Comment on“On the controversy around Daganzo's requiem for and Aw-Rascle's resurrection of second-order traffic flow models”by D. Helbing and A.F. Johansson What faster-than-traffic characteristic speeds mean for vehicular traffic flow

机译:D. Helbing和A.F. Johansson评述“关于Daganzo要求赎罪和Aw-Rascle复活二阶交通流的争议”,交通速度快于交通的特征速度意味着什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There has been a debate in the transportation research community over the validity of a class of traffic flow models. These models have the peculiar property that one of its characteristic speeds is faster than that of vehicular traffic. This note attempts to provide an overview of the diverging views on how to interpret this property, and specific comments on the interpretation of Helbing and Johansson [On the controversy around Daganzo's requiem for and Aω-Rascle's resurrection of second-order traffic flow models,Eur. Phys. J. B (2009),DOI:10.1140/epjb/e2009-00182-7]. We showed that having faster-than-traffic characteristics does produce counterintuitive predictions, and they cannot be explained away by a linear stability analysis. As such, the existence of such characteristics must be justified by the physics of traffic, and verified through empirical observations.
机译:在交通运输研究界中,关于一类交通流模型的有效性一直存在争议。这些模型具有独特的特性,即其特征速度之一比车辆交通的速度快。本注释旨在概述如何解释此属性的不同观点,并就Helbing和Johansson的解释提供具体意见[关于Daganzo的安魂曲和Aω-Rascle的二阶交通流模型的复活,Eur 。物理J.B(2009),DOI:10.1140 / epjb / e2009-00182-7]。我们表明,具有比交通流量快的特征确实会产生违反直觉的预测,并且无法通过线性稳定性分析来解释它们。因此,必须通过交通物理学来证明这些特征的存在,并通过经验观察加以验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号