...
首页> 外文期刊>The Canadian journal of cardiology >Effects of an enhanced secondary prevention program for patients with heart disease: a prospective randomized trial.
【24h】

Effects of an enhanced secondary prevention program for patients with heart disease: a prospective randomized trial.

机译:增强的二级预防计划对心脏病患者的影响:一项前瞻性随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Secondary prevention medications in cardiac patients improve outcomes. However, prescription rates for these drugs and long-term adherence are suboptimal. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an enhanced secondary prevention program improves outcomes. METHODS: Hospitalized patients with indications for secondary prevention medications were randomly assigned to either usual care or an intervention arm, in which an intensive program was used to optimize prescription rates and long-term adherence. Follow-up was 19 months. RESULTS: A total of 2643 patients were randomly assigned in the study; 1342 patients were assigned to usual care and 1301 patients were assigned to the intervention arm. Prescription rates were near optimal except for lipid-lowering medications. Rehospitalization rates per 100 patients were 136.2 and 132.6 over 19 months in the usual care and intervention groups, respectively (P=0.59). Total days in hospital per patient were similar (10.9 days in the usual care group versus 10.2 days in the intervention group; P not significant). Crude mortality was 6.2% and 5.5% in the usual care and intervention groups, respectively, with no significant difference (P=0.15) in overall survival. Post hoc analysis suggested that after the study team became experienced, days in hospital per patient were reduced by the program (11.1+/-0.91 and 8.9+/-0.61 in the usual care and intervention groups, respectively; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention program failed to improve outcomes in the present study. One explanation for these results is the near optimal physician compliance with guidelines in both groups. It is also possible that a substantial learning curve for the staff was involved, as suggested by the reduction in total days in hospital in the intervention patients during the second part of the study.
机译:背景:心脏病患者的二级预防药物可改善预后。但是,这些药物的处方率和长期依从性都不理想。目的:确定加强的二级预防计划是否可以改善预后。方法:将有二级预防药物适应症的住院患者随机分配至常规护理或干预组,其中采用强化方案以优化处方率和长期依从性。随访19个月。结果:总共2643例患者被随机分配到研究中。将1342例患者分配到常规护理中,将1301例患者分配到干预组。除降脂药物外,处方率接近最佳。在常规护理和干预组中,在过去19个月中,每100名患者的再入院率分别为136.2和132.6(P = 0.59)。每位患者的总住院天数相近(普通护理组为10.9天,干预组为10.2天; P不显着)。常规治疗和干预组的粗死亡率分别为6.2%和5.5%,总体存活率无显着差异(P = 0.15)。事后分析表明,在研究团队经验丰富之后,该程序减少了每位患者的住院天数(常规护理和干预组分别为11.1 +/- 0.91和8.9 +/- 0.61; P <0.05)。结论:干预计划未能改善本研究的结果。这些结果的一种解释是两组医生均接近最佳指南。在研究的第二部分期间,干预患者住院总天数的减少也表明,可能涉及到员工的大量学习曲线。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号