首页> 外文期刊>Pure and Applied Geophysics >Dispersion Measurements of P Waves and their Implications for Mantle Q_p
【24h】

Dispersion Measurements of P Waves and their Implications for Mantle Q_p

机译:P波的色散测量及其对地幔Q_p的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We analyze the anelasticity of the earth using group delays of P-body waves of deep (>200 km) events in the period range 4-32 s for epicentral distances of 5-85 degrees. We show that Time Frequency Analysis (TFA), which is usually applied to very dispersive surface waves, can be applied to the much less dispersive P-body waves to measures frequency-dependent group delays with respect to arrival times predicted from the CMT centroid location and PREM reference model. We find that the measured dispersion is due to: (1) anelasticity (described by the P-wave quality factor Q_p), (2) ambient noise, which results in randomly distributed noise in the dispersion measurements, (3) interference with other phases (triplications, crustal reverberations, conversions at deep mantle boundaries), for which the total dispersion depends on the amplitude and time separation between the different phases, and (4) the source time function, which is dispersive when the wavelet is asymmetrical or contains subevents. These mechanisms yield dispersion ranging in the order of one to 10 seconds with anelasticity responsible for the more modest dispersion. We select 150 seismograms which all have small coda amplitudes extending to ten percent of the main arrival, minimizing the effect of interference. The main P waves have short durations, minimizing effects of the source. We construct a two-layer model of Q_p with an interface at 660 km depth and take Q_p constant with period. Our data set is too small to solve for a possible frequency dependence of Q_p. The upper mantle Q_1 is 476 [299-1176] and the lower mantle Q_2 is 794 [633-1064] (the bracketed number indicate the 68 percept confidence range of Q_p~(-1)). These values are in-between the AK135 model (Kennett et al., 1995) and the PREM model (Deiewonski and Anderson, 1981) for the lower mantle and confirm results of Warren and Shearer (2000) that the upper mantle is less attenuating than PREM and AK135.
机译:我们使用深度(> 200 km)事件的P体波在4-32 s周期范围内针对震中中心距离5-85度的群延迟来分析地球的无弹性。我们表明,时频分析(TFA)通常应用于非常分散的表面波,可以应用于频散较小的P体波,以测量与频率相关的群延迟,这些延迟取决于从CMT质心位置预测的到达时间和PREM参考模型。我们发现测得的色散是由于:(1)无弹性(由P波品质因数Q_p描述),(2)环境噪声,这导致色散测量中的噪声随机分布,(3)对其他相位的干扰(重复,地壳混响,深地幔边界的转换),其总色散取决于不同相之间的振幅和时间间隔,以及(4)源时间函数,当小波不对称或包含子事件时,它是分散的。这些机制产生的分散范围约为1到10秒,而无弹性的分散则更为适度。我们选择了150个地震图,这些地震图的尾波幅度都较小,延伸到主要到达频率的百分之十,从而将干扰的影响降至最低。主P波的持续时间短,从而将源的影响降至最低。我们构造了一个具有660 km深度的界面的Q_p的两层模型,并取Q_p随周期常数。我们的数据集太小,无法解决Q_p可能的频率依赖性。上地幔Q_1为476 [299-1176],下地幔Q_2为794 [633-1064](方括号内的数字表示Q_p〜(-1)的68个感知置信范围。这些值在下地幔的AK135模型(Kennett等,1995)和PREM模型(Deiewonski和Anderson,1981)之间,并证实了Warren和Shearer(2000)的结果是上地幔的衰减小于PREM和AK135。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号