首页> 外文期刊>Pure and Applied Geophysics >Numerical Prediction of Cold Season Fog Events over Complex Terrain: the Performance of the WRF Model During MATERHORN-Fog and Early Evaluation
【24h】

Numerical Prediction of Cold Season Fog Events over Complex Terrain: the Performance of the WRF Model During MATERHORN-Fog and Early Evaluation

机译:复杂地形上冷季雾事件的数值预测:WRF模型在MATERHORN-Fog期间的性能和早期评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A field campaign to study cold season fog in complex terrain was conducted as a component of the Mountain Terrain Atmospheric Modeling and Observations (MATERHORN) Program from 07 January to 01 February 2015 in Salt Lake City and Heber City, Utah, United States. To support the field campaign, an advanced research version of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model was used to produce real-time forecasts and model evaluation. This paper summarizes the model performance and preliminary evaluation of the model against the observations. Results indicate that accurately forecasting fog is challenging for the WRF model, which produces large errors in the near-surface variables, such as relative humidity, temperature, and wind fields in the model forecasts. Specifically, compared with observations, the WRF model overpredicted fog events with extended duration in Salt Lake City because it produced higher moisture, lower wind speeds, and colder temperatures near the surface. In contrast, the WRF model missed all fog events in Heber City, as it reproduced lower moisture, higher wind speeds, and warmer temperatures against observations at the near-surface level. The inability of the model to produce proper levels of near-surface atmospheric conditions under fog conditions reflects uncertainties in model physical parameterizations, such as the surface layer, boundary layer, and microphysical schemes.
机译:2015年1月7日至2月1日,在美国犹他州盐湖城和希伯城,开展了一项野外研究活动,以研究复杂地形中的冷季雾,这是“山地大气建模与观测”(MATERHORN)计划的一部分。为了支持野外活动,使用了天气研究和预报(WRF)模型的高级研究版本来生成实时预报和模型评估。本文总结了模型的性能,并根据观察结果对该模型进行了初步评估。结果表明,准确预测雾对WRF模型具有挑战性,因为WRF模型会在近地表变量中产生较大的误差,例如模型预测中的相对湿度,温度和风场。具体而言,与观察结果相比,WRF模型在盐湖城持续时间过长的情况下高估了雾霾事件,因为它在地面附近产生了更高的湿度,更低的风速和更低的温度。相比之下,WRF模型错过了希伯城的所有大雾事件,因为它再现了较低的湿度,较高的风速和较高的温度,与近地表水平的观测结果相反。该模型无法在雾条件下产生适当水平的近地面大气条件,反映了模型物理参数化(例如表层,边界层和微物理方案)的不确定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号