...
首页> 外文期刊>Physiotherapy >Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and transcutaneous spinal electroanalgesia: a preliminary efficacy and mechanisms-based investigation.
【24h】

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and transcutaneous spinal electroanalgesia: a preliminary efficacy and mechanisms-based investigation.

机译:经皮神经电刺激和经皮脊髓电镇痛:初步疗效和基于机制的调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and transcutaneous spinal electroanalgesia (TSE) on mechanical pain threshold (MPT) and vibration threshold (VT). DESIGN: A prospective, single-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Laboratory based. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-four healthy volunteers (12 men and 22 women; mean age+/-standard deviation 30+/-8 years). Exclusion criteria were conditions affecting upper limb sensation and contraindications to electrical stimulation. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were allocated at random to receive TENS (n=8), TSE (n=8), placebo (n=9) or control (n=9). Electrical stimulation was applied for 30 minutes (from time 18 minutes to 48 minutes) via electrodes (5 cmx5 cm) placed centrally above and below the space between the C6 and C7 spinous processes, with 5 cm between electrodes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: MPT (using an algometer) and VT (using a vibrameter) were recorded on seven occasions from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand - at baseline (0 minutes) and then at 10-minute intervals until the end of the 60-minute testing period. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant group differences in MPT (all p>0.05). Significant group differences in VT were found at 20, 30 and 40 minutes (all p<0.05). Post-hoc tests showed that the TENS group had significantly greater VT than both the placebo [median difference 0.30 microm, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.05 to 0.66] and control (0.51 microm, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.97) groups at 20 minutes, and significantly greater VT than the control group (0.69 microm, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.17) at 30 minutes (all p<0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Electrical stimulation did not alter MPT. The increase in VT during TENS may be due to distraction or antidromic block of large-diameter nerve fibres. TSE failed to alter either outcome measure significantly.
机译:目的:确定经皮电神经刺激(TENS)和经皮脊柱电镇痛(TSE)对机械疼痛阈值(MPT)和振动阈值(VT)的影响。设计:一项前瞻性,单盲,随机,安慰剂对照试验。地点:基于实验室。参与者:34名健康志愿者(12名男性和22名女性;平均年龄+/-标准差30 +/- 8岁)。排除标准是影响上肢感觉的条件和电刺激的禁忌症。干预措施:随机分配参与者以接受TENS(n = 8),TSE(n = 8),安慰剂(n = 9)或对照组(n = 9)。通过在C6和C7棘突之间的空间上方和下方居中放置的电极(5 cmx5 cm)施加电刺激30分钟(从18分钟到48分钟),电极之间5 cm。主要观察指标:从右手第一个背侧骨间肌开始,在基线(0分钟),然后以10分钟的间隔,直到结束前的七次记录MPT(使用血压计)和VT(使用振动计)。 60分钟的测试时间。结果:MPT组无统计学意义(均p> 0.05)。在20、30和40分钟时发现VT的显着组间差异(所有p <0.05)。事后测试显示,TENS组的VT明显高于安慰剂组[中位数差0.30微米,95%置信区间(CI)-0.05至0.66]和对照组(0.51微米,95%CI 0.05至0.97)。 20分钟时,在30分钟时的VT明显高于对照组(0.69微米,95%CI 0.20至1.17)(所有p <0.008)。结论:电刺激并未改变MPT。 TENS期间VT的增加可能是由于大直径神经纤维的牵张或反行阻塞。 TSE未能显着改变任何一项结果指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号