...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Externalities of energy sources: The operation of a municipal solid waste-to-energy incineration facility in the greater Thessaloniki area, Greece
【24h】

Externalities of energy sources: The operation of a municipal solid waste-to-energy incineration facility in the greater Thessaloniki area, Greece

机译:能源的外部性:希腊大村庄地区的市政固体废物焚烧设施的运作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is much debate around promoting waste to energy incineration facilities in many communities globally, mainly because of social opposition against potential negative health effects of the operation of these installations close to urban areas. In this paper, a novel decision support approach is developed and its applicability is demonstrated for the greater Thessaloniki area, Greece. In this area, the incineration facilities are hotly debated, mainly due to the "Not In My Back Yard" syndrome related with health considerations. The exclusive method of treatment is landfilling. Health impacts and corresponding externalities attributed to the operation of an incineration facility are reliably estimated. Three potential alternative sites and three scenarios of emission rates are considered, depending on the abatement technology used. The estimated externalities are compared to the corresponding ones attributed to other pressures in the area. The "Years of Life Lost (YOLL)" indicator attributed to the operation of the facility is 2.8 YOLL in the worst-case scenario. This corresponds to a minimal added implication in comparison with the 11,044 YOLL estimated for the area due to the other environmental pressures (road traffic, space heating, industrial activity). The externalities ratio (externalities due to incineration facility/total externalities) for the region is approximately 0.03%. Thus, the impact of this operation on human health is negligible -and preferable to landfilling-even in the case that maximum emission rates are considered. Efforts should be targeted towards enhancing public awareness and militating the widely acknowledged "Not In My Back Yard" syndrome by local communities. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在全球许多社区的促进浪费方面有很多辩论,主要是因为社会反对对城市地区靠近这些装置的运作的潜在负面健康影响。本文开发了一种新的决策支持方法,其适用性被展示了希腊塞萨洛尼基地区。在这方面,焚烧设施热烈辩论,主要是由于与健康考虑相关的“不在我的后院”综合征。独家治疗方法是填埋。归因于焚烧设施运行的健康影响和相应的外部性是可靠的。考虑三个潜在的替代网站和三种对排放率的情况,具体取决于所使用的减排技术。将估计的外部性与该区域中的其他压力归因于相应的外部性。归因于设施运行的“越来越多的生命(yoll)”指标在最坏情况场景中呈现2.8 yoll。这相当于与该区域的11,044 yoll估计的11,044 yoll由于其他环境压力(道路交通,空间加热,工业活性)相比,这对应于最小的含义。该地区的外部性比率(由于焚烧设施/总外外部性)的比例约为0.03%。因此,这种操作对人体健康的影响是可忽略不计的 - 但对于填埋 - 即使在考虑最大排放率的情况下也是如此。应努力提高公众意识,并将当地社区的广泛认可的“不在我的后院”综合征中。 (c)2020 elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号