...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Comparative characterization of digestate versus pig slurry and cow manure - Chemical composition and effects on soil microbial activity
【24h】

Comparative characterization of digestate versus pig slurry and cow manure - Chemical composition and effects on soil microbial activity

机译:消化液与猪粪和牛粪的比较表征化学成分及其对土壤微生物活性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The growing number of biogas plants in Europe has resulted in increased production of nutrient-rich digestate with great potential as fertilizer for arable land. The nutrient composition of digestate varies with the substrate treated in the biogas plant and may contain compounds that stimulate or inhibit soil microbial activity. This study compared 20 digestates (D) with 10 pig slurries (PS) and 10 cow manures (CM) regarding their chemical content and their effect on soil microbial activities, i.e. potential ammonia oxidation rate (PAO) and soil respiration. The results showed no significant differences within the D group when divided based on substrate type. i.e. manure dominated vs. other organic waste materials in any of the tests. In general D contained significantly higher concentrations of ammonium while the concentrations of total carbon and volatile fatty acids were higher in PS and CM than in D. The D showed both stimulating and inhibiting effects on PAO, while all CM and all PS except one showed inhibiting effects on PAO. However, PAO activity was negatively correlated with the content of volatile fatty acids in the residues indicating that these compounds may be the cause of the inhibition. The maximum respiration activity (h_(peakmax)) was lower and the time point for the maximum respiration activity (t_(peakmax)) occurred earlier for D compared with CM and PS. This earlier peak time could be indicative of a high proportion of easily degradable carbon in D compared with PS and CM. However, the utilization rate of carbon, i.e. the proportion of added organic C converted to CO_2-C during 12 days, did not differ significantly between D, PS and CM, indicating that overall carbon quality in the different fertilizers was still roughly comparable. In short, our results suggest that digestates were different compared with PS and CM but without posing a higher risk with respect to their impact on soil microbial activity.
机译:欧洲沼气厂的数量不断增加,导致营养丰富的消化物的产量增加,具有很大的潜力作为耕地肥料。消化液的营养成分随沼气厂处理过的底物而异,可能含有刺激或抑制土壤微生物活性的化合物。这项研究比较了20种消化物(D)和10种猪粪便(PS)和10种牛粪(CM)的化学含量及其对土壤微生物活性的影响,即潜在的氨氧化率(PAO)和土壤呼吸。结果显示,按底物类型划分时,D组内无显着差异。即在任何一项测试中,肥料占主导地位的是其他有机废物。总的来说,D中的铵态氮含量明显高于D和D。PS和CM中总碳和挥发性脂肪酸的含量均高于D。D对PAO既具有刺激作用,又具有抑制作用,而除一种以外,所有CM和PS均具有抑制作用。对PAO的影响。但是,PAO活性与残基中挥发性脂肪酸的含量呈负相关,表明这些化合物可能是抑制的原因。与CM和PS相比,D的最大呼吸活动(h_(peakmax))较低,最大呼吸活动(t_(peakmax))的时间点更早。与PS和CM相比,这个更早的高峰时间可能表明D中易分解碳的比例很高。但是,D,PS和CM之间的碳利用率(即12天内转化为CO_2-C的添加有机碳的比例)在D,PS和CM之间没有显着差异,表明不同肥料的总体碳质量仍可大致比较。简而言之,我们的研究结果表明,与PS和CM相比,消化物有所不同,但是它们对土壤微生物活性的影响并未带来更高的风险。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Waste Management》 |2017年第3期|529-538|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Microbiology, Uppsala BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7025, SE 75007 Uppsala, Sweden;

    Department of Microbiology, Uppsala BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7025, SE 75007 Uppsala, Sweden;

    Department of Microbiology, Uppsala BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7025, SE 75007 Uppsala, Sweden;

    Department of Microbiology, Uppsala BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7025, SE 75007 Uppsala, Sweden;

    Department of Microbiology, Uppsala BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7025, SE 75007 Uppsala, Sweden;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Digestate; Plant nutrient characterization; Potential ammonia oxidation; Soil respiration;

    机译:Digestate;植物营养素表征;潜在的氨氧化;土壤呼吸;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号