...
【24h】

Comment

机译:评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Lead Paper by Chapman and Gorina lucidly sets out the issues surrounding Tax Increment Financing (TIF) in the US context, presenting some provocative food for thought as to how TIF might operate in the UK and, as the introduction of TIF approaches for England, what we might learn from the North American experience. It is important, therefore, to understand the fiscal differences between the US and UK contexts, particularly in respect of local government finance. The fiscal instruments available to local government in the UK at the time of writing are virtually nil, the exception being Council Tax (the local domestic property tax), which does not loom large as a potential revenue stream for TIF. However, with the potential local retention of business rates proposed by the current Local Government Resource Review (DCLG, 2011), this picture could change significantly.
机译:查普曼(Chapman)和戈琳娜(Gorina)撰写的《领导论文》清楚地阐述了在美国背景下税收增量融资(TIF)的问题,提出了一些具有启发性的思想,供人们思考TIF在英国的运作方式,以及随着TIF在英国的引入,我们可以从北美的经验中学到什么。因此,重要的是要了解美英两国之间的财政差异,特别是在地方政府财政方面。在撰写本文时,英国地方政府可使用的财政手段几乎为零,但议会税(地方国内财产税)除外,该税在TIF的潜在收入中所占的比重并不大。但是,随着当前《地方政府资源审查》(DCLG,2011年)提议在当地保留营业费率,情况可能会发生很大变化。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Town planning review》 |2012年第2期|p.208-212|共5页
  • 作者

    Chris Murray;

  • 作者单位

    Chief Executive of the Core Cities Group of the eight largest English cities outside London, Express Networks, i George Leigh Street, Manchester M4 5DL;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号