...
首页> 外文期刊>Thinking & Reasoning >Mental models in propositional reasoning and working memory's central executive
【24h】

Mental models in propositional reasoning and working memory's central executive

机译:命题推理和工作记忆的中央执行者的心理模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We examine the role of working memory's central executive in the mental model explanation of propositional reasoning by using two working memory measures: the classical "reading span" test by Daneman and Carpenter (1980) and a new measure. This new "reasoning span" measure requires individuals to solve very simple anaphora problems, and store and remember the word solution in a growing series of inferential problems. We present one experiment in which we check the involvement of the central executive in conditional and disjunctive inference tasks and compare predictions of the new reasoning span test with those of the classical reading span test. The results of the experiment confirm that reasoning responses, which according to mental model theory require high cognitive work, are predicted by working memory measures. Results also show that some reasoning responses are probably obtained by means of superficial biases or strategies that do not load working memory. The reasoning span test, which involves the central executive to a greater degree, predicts reasoning performance better than the reading span test. The significance and possibilities of the new measure in studying reasoning are discussed.
机译:我们通过使用两种工作记忆量度来研究工作记忆中心执行者在命题推理的心理模型解释中的作用:Daneman和Carpenter(1980)的经典“阅读跨度”检验和一项新量度。这种新的“推理跨度”度量要求个人解决非常简单的回指问题,并在不断增长的一系列推理问题中存储和记住单词解。我们提出了一个实验,在该实验中,我们检查了中央执行官在条件和析取推理任务中的参与程度,并将新推理跨度测试的预测与经典阅读跨度测试的预测进行了比较。实验结果证实,根据心理模型理论需要较高认知能力的推理反应是通过工作记忆量来预测的。结果还表明,某些推理反应可能是通过不加载工作记忆的表面偏见或策略获得的。推理跨度测试在更大程度上涉及中央执行机构,它比阅读跨度测验更好地预测推理性能。讨论了新方法在研究推理中的意义和可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号