...
首页> 外文期刊>Research in Post-Compulsory Education >Are all assessments equal? The comparability of demands of college-based assessments in a vocationally related qualification
【24h】

Are all assessments equal? The comparability of demands of college-based assessments in a vocationally related qualification

机译:所有评估是否均等?具有职业相关资格的大学评估的需求可比性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The consistency of assessment demands is important to validity. This research investigated the comparability of the demands of college-assessed units within a vocationally related qualification, drawing on methodological approaches that have previously been used to compare assessments. Assessment materials from five colleges were obtained. After some initial familiarisation and the revision of a framework of demands, 15 expert judges compared the assessment materials from pairs of colleges in turn. For each pair, each judge evaluated which college's assessment tasks they considered more demanding on a number of dimensions and overall. Analyses suggested that assessments were more demanding at some colleges than others but that differences were not large. An interview study was also conducted in four colleges. The interview data suggested substantial similarities between colleges in the assessment tasks conducted. However, some differences that could affect demands were identified (e.g., degree of authenticity of tasks, availability of exemplars when writing reports).
机译:评估要求的一致性对于有效性至关重要。这项研究利用以前用于比较评估的方法论方法,研究了与职业相关的资格内的大学评估单位的需求的可比性。获得了五所学院的评估材料。经过初步了解和需求框架修订后,15位专家法官依次比较了两所大学的评估材料。对于每一对,每位法官都会评估他们认为哪些学院的评估任务在多个维度和总体上要求更高。分析表明,一些大学比其他大学对评估的要求更高,但差异并不大。还对四所大学进行了访谈研究。访谈数据表明,在评估工作方面,各大学之间存在很大的相似性。但是,确定了一些可能影响需求的差异(例如,任务的真实性程度,编写报告时示例的可用性)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号