...
首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >Lost in transition: Between late pleistocene and Early Holocene around the adriatic
【24h】

Lost in transition: Between late pleistocene and Early Holocene around the adriatic

机译:过渡失去:亚得里亚人周围的早期和全新世 - 之间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

What happened at the transition between late Pleistocene and early Holocene in Italy and the Western Balkans remains up to now an unresolved question. While in recent years, research has been conducted in several re-gions, it is still difficult to propose a synthetic model for the changes that occurred in material cultures during this period. Multiple causes may explain this, but the apparent diversity of scenarios illustrated by each region seems to be the most explanatory. Terms such as terminal or final Epigravettian, Epipaleolithic, Romanelian and Sauveterrian, used in certain contexts, do not have a generally accepted definition.Some of these terms have been criticized and, at least, their definition should be reevaluated in accordance with modern methodological norms. Nevertheless, they indicate an actual diversity of regional and chronological expressions that we should describe precisely and integrate into a comprehensive model for the changes that occurred in this critical phase of the Late Upper Paleolithic.On a global scale, it has been argued that in contrast to what has been described in Western Europe for example, no discontinuity between the end of the Epigravettian and the first Mesolithic is evident.To better understand this period and its dynamics, it is necessary to initiate a hierarchical analysis of the elements of unit and variability across time and among the different regions. In order do to so, it is necessary to engage (1) a critical review of the available data and (2) a comparative technological analysis of different assemblages.This paper is a first step in this direction. We focus especially on the current study of two assemblages from Italy and the Western Balkans: grotta della Continenza (Central Italy) and Medena Stijena (Montenegro). We also include published data from the recent study of the sequence of grotta del Cavallo (Southern Italy). To sum up, we discuss the chronological and geographical variability in Italy and the Western Balkans based on a regional synthesis.
机译:在意大利的晚熟和全新生早期之间的过渡发生了什么,而西部巴尔干半部仍然是一个未解决的问题。虽然近年来,研究已经在几种再园区进行了研究,但仍然难以在此期间提出素质培养物中发生的变化的合成模型。多种原因可以解释这一点,但每个地区所示的情景的表观多样性似乎是最具解释性的。在某些情况下使用的终端或最终EPIGRAVETIAN,eBIPaleolithic,Romanelian和Sauveterrian等术语没有普遍接受的定义。这些术语的批评已经受到批评,并且至少应根据现代方法的规范重新评估其定义。然而,他们表明了区域和年表表达的实际多样性,即我们应该精确地描述,并融入古石后期古石中期临界阶段发生的变化的综合模型。全球规模,有人认为相比之下对于西欧的描述,例如,EPIGRAVETIAN的末端和第一个迭代斯之间没有不连续性是明显的。要更好地理解这一时期及其动态,有必要启动单位和可变性元素的分层分析横跨不同地区。为了这样做,有必要参与(1)对可用数据的关键评论和(2)不同组件的比较技术分析。本文是朝这个方向的第一步。我们专注于目前关于来自意大利和西部巴尔干的两个集会的研究:Grotta della incletenza(意大利中部)和梅纳斯蒂赫纳(黑山)。我们还包括最近关于Grotta del Cavallo(意大利南部)序列的公布数据。总而言之,我们讨论了意大利和西巴尔干的按时间和地理变异,基于区域综合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号