...
首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear fusion >Inter-machine validation study of neoclassical transport modelling in medium- to high-density stellarator-heliotron plasmas
【24h】

Inter-machine validation study of neoclassical transport modelling in medium- to high-density stellarator-heliotron plasmas

机译:中至高密度恒星-恒电子控等离子体中新古典运输模型的机器间验证研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A comparative study of energy transport for medium- to high-density discharges in the stellarator-heliotrons TJ-II, W7-AS and LHD is carried out. The specific discharge parameters are chosen to apply a recently concluded benchmarking study of neoclassical (NC) transport coefficients (Beidler et al 2011 Nucl. Fusion 51 076001) to perform this validation study. In contrast to previous experiments at low densities for which electron transport was predominant (Yokoyama et al 2007 Nucl. Fusion 47 1213), the current discharges also exhibit significant ion energy transport. As it affects the energy transport in 3D devices, the ambipolar radial electric field is addressed as well. For the discharges described, ion-root conditions, i.e. a small negative radial electric field were found. The energy transport in the peripheral region cannot be explained by NC theory. Within a 'core region' (r/a < 1/2 ~ 2/3), the predicted NC energy fluxes comply with experimental findings for W7-AS. For TJ-II, compliance in the core region is found for the particle transport and the electron energy transport. For the specific LHD discharges, the core energy transport complied with NC theory except for the electron energy transport in the inward-shifted magnetic configuration. The NC radial electric field tends to agree with experimental results for all devices but is measured to be more negative in the core of both LHD and TJ-II. As a general observation, the energy confinement time approaches the gyro-Bohm-type confinement scaling ISS04 (Yamada et al 2005 Nucl. Fusion 45 1684). This work is carried out within the International Stellarator-Heliotron Profile Database.
机译:对恒星旋转加速器TJ-II,W7-AS和LHD中至高密度放电的能量传输进行了比较研究。选择特定的排放参数,以应用新近完成的新古典(NC)传输系数基准研究(Beidler等人,2011 Nucl。Fusion 51 076001)来执行此验证研究。与先前的以电子传输为主的低密度实验相反(Yokoyama等人,2007 Nucl。Fusion 47 1213),电流放电也表现出显着的离子能量传输。由于它影响3D设备中的能量传输,因此也解决了双极性径向电场。对于所描述的放电,发现了离子根条件,即小的负径向电场。外围区域的能量传输无法用NC理论来解释。在“核心区域”(r / a <1/2〜2/3)内,预测的NC能量通量符合W7-AS的实验结果。对于TJ-II,发现在核心区域的顺应性用于粒子传输和电子能量传输。对于特定的LHD放电,除了向内移动的磁性结构中的电子能量传输以外,核心能量传输符合NC理论。 NC径向电场趋于与所有设备的实验结果一致,但是在LHD和TJ-II的核心中,NC径向电场被测量为更负。作为一般观察,能量约束时间接近陀螺-博姆型约束尺度ISS04(Yamada等,2005,Nucl.Fusion 45 1684)。这项工作是在国际恒星-Heliotron配置文件数据库中进行的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nuclear fusion》 |2013年第6期|063022.1-063022.8|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Max-Planck-Institut fuer Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, Greifswald, Germany;

    National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki, Japan;

    National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki, Japan;

    The National Fusion Laboratory, CIEMAT, EURATOM Association, Madrid, Spain;

    The National Fusion Laboratory, CIEMAT, EURATOM Association, Madrid, Spain;

    Max-Planck-Institut fuer Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, Greifswald, Germany;

    National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki, Japan;

    The National Fusion Laboratory, CIEMAT, EURATOM Association, Madrid, Spain;

    The National Fusion Laboratory, CIEMAT, EURATOM Association, Madrid, Spain;

    Max-Planck-Institut fuer Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, Greifswald, Germany;

    Max-Planck-Institut fuer Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, Greifswald, Germany;

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ, USA;

    Max-Planck-Institut fuer Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, Greifswald, Germany;

    National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki, Japan;

    National Research Center 'Kurchatov Institute', Moscow, Russia;

    Max-Planck-Institut fuer Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, Greifswald, Germany;

    The National Fusion Laboratory, CIEMAT, EURATOM Association, Madrid, Spain;

    Max-Planck-Institut fuer Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, Greifswald, Germany;

    National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki, Japan;

    National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki, Japan;

    Department of Nuclear Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan;

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ, USA;

    National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki, Japan;

    National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki, Japan;

    National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki, Japan;

    National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki, Japan;

    Max-Planck-Institut fuer Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, Greifswald, Germany;

    Department of Nuclear Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan;

    Max-Planck-Institut fuer Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, Greifswald, Germany;

    National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki, Japan;

    National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki, Japan;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号