首页> 外文期刊>NanoEthics >Temporal Perspectives of the Nanotechnological Challenge to Regulation: How Human Rights Can Contribute to the Present and Future of Nanotechnologies
【24h】

Temporal Perspectives of the Nanotechnological Challenge to Regulation: How Human Rights Can Contribute to the Present and Future of Nanotechnologies

机译:纳米技术对法规挑战的时空观点:人权如何为纳米技术的当前和未来做出贡献

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Expectations play a central role in understanding scientific and technological changes. Future-oriented representations are also central with regard to nanotechnologies as they can guide policy activities, provide structures and legitimation, attract different interests, focus policy-makers’ attention and foster investments for research. However, the emphasis on future scenarios tends to underrate the complexity of the challenges of the present market of nanotechnologies by flattening them under the needs and promises of scientific research. This is particularly apparent if we consider the viewpoint of the regulator who faces two different ranges of problems with regard to the market and research and is expected, simultaneously, to manage two different types of regulatory instruments, pursuing at the same time the same goals. Instead, by favoring only the future scenarios, the regulator runs the risk of abruptly shifting from more flexible and elastic tools to forms of hard legislation, wasting, thus, the resources of the soft-regulation, in particular those of self-regulation. By referring primarily to the European context, human rights, also thanks to their normative structure of principles, can help in strengthening both the legislation needed for regulating the present market and the soft instruments needed for steering research and for fostering the stakeholders’ participation without sacrificing the coherence of the regulatory response.
机译:期望在理解科学技术变化中起着核心作用。面向未来的代表在纳米技术方面也很重要,因为它们可以指导政策活动,提供结构和合法性,吸引不同的利益,吸引决策者的注意力并促进对研究的投资。但是,对未来场景的强调倾向于通过根据科学研究的需求和希望将它们压平,从而低估当前纳米技术市场挑战的复杂性。如果我们考虑监管者的观点,这一点尤其明显,监管者在市场和研究方面面临两个不同范围的问题,并期望同时管理两种不同类型的监管工具,同时追求相同的目标。取而代之的是,仅偏爱未来的情况,监管者冒着从更灵活和更具弹性的工具突然转变为硬立法形式的风险,从而浪费了软监管的资源,特别是自我监管的资源。通过主要参考欧洲的情况,人权,也归功于其规范性的原则结构,可以帮助加强规范当前市场所需的立法以及指导研究和促进利益相关者参与而不牺牲的软手段。监管反应的连贯性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号