...
首页> 外文期刊>Legal information management >Law Reporting and Public Access in the Courts: Is Too Much a Good Thing? Part 2: The New York Experience
【24h】

Law Reporting and Public Access in the Courts: Is Too Much a Good Thing? Part 2: The New York Experience

机译:法院的法律报告和公共访问:太多了吗?第2部分:纽约体验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article by Paul Magrath considers the role of law reporting not only as a service in support of the administration of justice and legal education, but also in the wider context of open justice, transparency and public legal information. It traces the history of law reporting and considers the pros and cons of the more comprehensive publication of judgments of the senior courts made possible by digitisation and the internet, in comparison with the more selective approach adopted in the past. The article is loosely based on a presentation given at the annual conference of the British and Irish Association of Law Librarians held in Bournemouth in June 2019.
机译:保罗·马格拉斯(Paul Magrath)的这篇文章认为,法律报告的作用不仅是支持司法和法律教育的一种服务,而且在公开司法,透明度和公共法律信息等更广泛的背景下也是如此。它追溯了法律报告的历史,并考虑了数字化和互联网使高级法院判决更全面地发表的利弊,与过去采用的更选择性的方法相比。本文大致基于2019年6月在伯恩茅斯举行的英国和爱尔兰法律图书馆员协会年度会议上的演讲。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号