Corrigendum

摘要

Within this article a footnote appeared as part of the main text.rnThe text in question appeared within the second paragraph on p. 345 and should have beenrnfootnoted as follows:rnWhere an individual could not enjoy security in their ownership of property, could not safeguard the profits of their labours, could not be guaranteed reward or preferment for outstanding ability or expertise, why, British commentators asked, would they outlay the capital or effort necessary for the improvement of agriculture, manufacture or education that were considered imperatives for progress?