...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydraulic Engineering >Discussion Of 'flow Intensity Parameter In Pier Scour Experiments' Gonzalo Simarro, Luis Teixeira, Antonio H. Cardoso
【24h】

Discussion Of 'flow Intensity Parameter In Pier Scour Experiments' Gonzalo Simarro, Luis Teixeira, Antonio H. Cardoso

机译:对“码头冲刷实验中的流动强度参数”的讨论,贡萨洛·西玛罗(Gonzalo Simarro),路易斯·特谢拉(Luis Teixeira),安东尼奥·卡多佐(Antonio H. Cardoso)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The discussers appreciate the authors' efforts in presenting the significance of flow intensity in relation to scour depth around bridge pier under clear-water conditions. Through dimensional analysis, the authors pointed out that if the viscous effect indeed plays a negligible role in the local scour phenomenon, as many investigators suggested, then the flow intensity should be defined as u/u_c instead of u/u_c. Herein, u_c=pseudocritical velocity defined in Eq. (20) in the paper and u_c=critical velocity defined in Eq. (8). The discussers are in agreement with the authors in their physical reasoning behind the dimensional analysis. However, comparing those two plots in Fig. 2 of the original paper, one can hardly conclude that the use of u/u_c improves the correlation. As a matter of fact, when ulu_c is employed, the data set with h/d_(50) ≈ 208 (marked with crosses) deviates significantly from the other two sets with h/d_(50) ≈ 13. In other words, this deviation is attributable to flow depth effect, which should be taken into account to improve the correlation in all series.
机译:讨论者赞赏作者在呈现清水条件下流量强度与桥墩周围冲刷深度的关系方面所做的努力。通过尺寸分析,作者指出,如许多研究人员所建议的那样,如果粘性效应在局部冲刷现象中的作用确实可以忽略不计,则应将流动强度定义为u / u_c而不是u / u_c。在此,u_c =在等式中定义的伪临界速度。本文中的(20)和u_c =等式中定义的临界速度。 (8)。讨论者在尺寸分析背后的物理推理上与作者一致。但是,通过比较原始论文的图2中的这两个图,很难得出结论,使用u / u_c可以改善相关性。事实上,当使用ulu_c时,h / d_(50)≈208(标有叉号)的数据集与其他两个h / d_(50)≈13的数据集有很大的出入。偏差可归因于流量深度效应,应将其考虑在内以改善所有系列的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号