...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydraulic Engineering >Near-Transducer Errors in ADCP Measurements: Experimental Findings
【24h】

Near-Transducer Errors in ADCP Measurements: Experimental Findings

机译:ADCP测量中的近传感器误差:实验结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCPs) are not able to accurately determine velocity near their transducers and near the bed. These limitations have restricted the use of ADCPs to flow depths that are large enough to allow acquisition of few directly measured velocity data that can be subsequently used to accurately estimate vertical velocity profiles and flow discharge in cross sections. While the causes that make ADCPs unable to collect data in the near-bed region are relatively well documented, the causes of near-transducer errors have not yet been fully understood and are only partly documented. We present results from an experimental study aimed at characterizing the systematic errors due to the combined effect of acoustic interference and instrument-induced flow disturbance near a Janus-configured ADCP. The study comprises: (1) concurrent measurements with an ADCP and an acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) under the ADCP; (2) measurements of the flow disturbance produced by the ADCP in the vertical and horizontal planes; and (3) ADV measurements along the path of the acoustic beams ensonified by the ADCP during a measurement. Results suggest that ADCPs bias low the velocity profiles with respect to the undisturbed velocity profiles, mostly because of the flow disturbance induced by the ADCP, with acoustic effects playing a secondary role. For the range of flows we studied, both undisturbed and disturbed profiles exhibit similar shapes when plotted in dimensionless form, with the bulk flow velocity and the ADCP diameter (D) as characteristic scales. The differences between the undisturbed and the ADCP-disturbed profiles extend up to a distance of about 1.5D from the ADCP, except for the profiles measured at locations where the flow depth is close to D for which the boundary layer induced by the ADCP interacts with the one induced by the flume bed.
机译:声学多普勒电流剖面仪(ADCP)无法准确确定其换能器附近和床附近的速度。这些限制已将ADCP的使用限制在足够大的流量深度,以允许采集少量直接测量的速度数据,这些数据随后可用于准确估算垂直速度曲线和横截面中的流量。尽管使ADCP无法在近床层区域收集数据的原因已得到充分记录,但尚未完全理解近传感器错误的原因,仅部分记录了这些原因。我们目前的一项实验研究结果旨在表征由于Janus配置的ADCP附近的声干扰和仪器引起的流量扰动的综合影响而导致的系统误差。这项研究包括:(1)用ADCP和ADCP下的声学多普勒测速仪(ADV)进行同时测量; (2)测量ADCP在垂直和水平面上产生的流动扰动; (3)在测量过程中,沿由ADCP共振的声束路径进行ADV测量。结果表明,ADCP相对于未扰动速度分布偏向于降低速度分布,这主要是由于ADCP引起的流动扰动,而声学效应起次要作用。对于我们研究的流量范围,当以无量纲形式绘制时,未扰动和扰动轮廓都显示相似的形状,其中整体流速和ADCP直径(D)为特征标度。未扰动轮廓与ADCP受扰轮廓之间的差异延伸到与ADCP的距离约为1.5D,但在流深接近D的位置处测量的轮廓除外,ADCP诱导的边界层与该深度相互作用由水槽引起的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号