...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Impact of income inequality and environmental regulation on environmental quality: Evidence from China
【24h】

Impact of income inequality and environmental regulation on environmental quality: Evidence from China

机译:收入不平等和环境监管对环境质量的影响:来自中国的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

China's environmental pollution is of widespread concern, and environmental governance has become the country's main method of achieving high-quality development. Environmental quality is a comprehensive indicator, which includes many factors, such as air, water, and solid waste pollution. This study did not use a single pollutant as a substitute variable for environmental quality. Firstly, we used principal component analysis to construct a comprehensive environmental quality index. Secondly, the Stochastic Impacts by Regression on Population, Affluence, and Technology and panel quantile regression models were used with data from 30 Chinese provinces in China from 1998 to 2017 to analyze the effect of income inequality and environmental regulation on environmental quality. The constructed comprehensive index revealed that China's environmental quality had an M-type trend over time. The mean regression results showed that income inequality and environmental regulation improved envi-ronmental quality, but higher income inequality reduced environmental quality. The panel quantile regression model results revealed that the coefficient of income inequality was positively significant at the 10-30% quantiles and negatively significant at the 70-90% quantiles. The coefficients of the absolute value of income inequality at the 10-30% quantiles were less than those at the 70-90% quantiles. This implied that higher income inequality reduced environmental quality, whereas higher environmental regulations improved environmental quality. Considering the possible impact of environmental quality on income inequality and environmental regulations, we designed a simultaneous equation model to overcome the deviation caused by bilateral causality. The conclusions of this study provide policymakers with a new perspective on environmental governance and new paths for achieving high-quality development. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:中国的环境污染是普遍的关注,环境治理已成为该国实现高质量发展的主要方法。环境质量是一个综合指标,包括许多因素,如空气,水和固体废物污染。本研究未使用单一污染物作为环境质量的替代变量。首先,我们使用主成分分析来构建综合环境质量指标。其次,对人口,富裕和技术和技术和面板数量回归模型的随机影响与来自1998年至2017年中国30个中国省份的数据一起使用,分析了收入不平等和环境监管对环境质量的影响。构建的综合指标表明,中国的环境质量随着时间的推移而具有M型趋势。平均回归结果表明,收入不平等和环境监管改善了环境质量,但收入不平等提高了环境质量。面板分位数回归模型结果显示,收入不等式系数在10-30%的量率下具有肯定显着,并且在70-90%的量级中产生负面显着。 10-30%量率在10-30%的量度的绝对值的系数小于70-90%的量数。这意味着更高的收入不平等降低了环境质量,而环境法规更高,改善了环境质量。考虑到环境质量对收入不平等和环境法规的影响,我们设计了一个同时等式模型,以克服双侧因果关系引起的偏差。本研究的结论为政策制定者提供了关于环境治理和实现高质量发展的新路径的新视角。 (c)2020 elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号