首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology >Combining escitalopram with gaboxadol provides no additional benefit in the treatment of patients with severe major depressive disorder
【24h】

Combining escitalopram with gaboxadol provides no additional benefit in the treatment of patients with severe major depressive disorder

机译:依西酞普兰与加波沙朵合用在重度严重抑郁症患者的治疗中没有其他益处

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this proof-of-concept study was to compare the efficacy of escitalopram (20 mg/d) in combination with fixed doses of gaboxadol to escitalopram (20 mg) in the treatment of patients with severe major depressive disorder (MDD). Adult patients were randomized to 8 wk of double-blind treatment with fixed doses of placebo (n=71), escitalopram (20 mg, n=140), escitalopram (20 mg)+gaboxadol (5 mg) (n=139), or escitalopram (20 mg)+gaboxadol (10 mg) (n=140). The pre-defined primary analysis of efficacy was an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) of change from baseline to endpoint (week 8) in Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score using last observation carried forward (LOCF). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean change from baseline in MADRS total score between the 20 mg escitalopram+10 mg gaboxadol group and the 20 mg escitalopram group [difference=−0.45 MADRS points (95% CI −2.5 to 1.6, p=0.6619, full analysis set (FAS), LOCF, ANCOVA)] at week 8. The mean treatment differences to placebo at week 8 were −5.6 (95% CI −8.0 to −3.1, p<0.0001) (20 mg escitalopram), −5.1 (95% CI −7.5 to −2.7, p<0.0001) (20 mg escitalopram+5 mg gaboxadol), and −6.0 (95% CI −8.4 to −3.6, p<0.0001) (20 mg escitalopram+10 mg gaboxadol). The most common adverse events reported in the active treatment groups for which the incidence was higher than that in the placebo group, comprised nausea, anxiety and insomnia. There were no clinically relevant efficacy differences between a combination of escitalopram and gaboxadol compared to escitalopram alone in the treatment of severe MDD. All active treatment groups were superior in efficacy to placebo and were well tolerated.
机译:这项概念验证研究的目的是比较依他普仑(20 mg / d)与固定剂量加波沙朵对依他普仑(20 mg)联合治疗严重重度抑郁症(MDD)的疗效。成年患者随机接受固定剂量的安慰剂(n = 71),艾司西酞普兰(20 mg,n = 140),艾司西酞普兰(20 mg)+加波沙朵(5 mg)(n = 139),或依他普仑(20毫克)+加波沙朵(10毫克)(n = 140)。预先定义的疗效初步分析是对蒙哥马利-奥斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)总分从基线到终点(第8周)变化的协方差(ANCOVA)进行最后一次结转(LOCF)分析。 20 mg依他普仑+10 mg加波沙朵组和20 mg依西酞普兰组之间,MADRS总分的平均变化与基线相比无统计学显着差异[差异= -0.45 MADRS点(95%CI -2.5至1.6,p = 0.6619,完整分析集(FAS),LOCF,ANCOVA)]。在第8周时与安慰剂的平均治疗差异为-5.6(95%CI -8.0至-3.1,p <0.0001)(20 mg依他普仑), -5.1(95%CI -7.5至-2.7,p <0.0001)(20 mg依西酞普兰+5 mg加波沙朵)和-6.0(95%CI -8.4至-3.6,p <0.0001)(20 mg依西酞普兰+10 mg加波沙朵)。在积极治疗组中报告的最常见不良事件包括恶心,焦虑和失眠,其发生率高于安慰剂组。与单独使用依他普仑相比,依他普仑和加波沙朵的组合在治疗重度MDD方面没有临床相关的疗效差异。所有积极治疗组的疗效均优于安慰剂,且耐受性良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号