首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Combining moderators to identify clinical profiles of patients who will and will not benefit from aripiprazole augmentation for treatment resistant late-life major depressive disorder
【2h】

Combining moderators to identify clinical profiles of patients who will and will not benefit from aripiprazole augmentation for treatment resistant late-life major depressive disorder

机译:合并主持人确定哪些患者会受益于阿立哌唑增强治疗难治性重度抑郁症哪些患者不会受益

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Personalizing treatment for late-life depression requires identifying and integrating information from multiple factors that influence treatment efficacy (moderators). We performed exploratory moderator analyses using data from a multi-site, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of aripiprazole augmentation. Patients (n=159) aged ≥60 years had major depressive disorder that failed to remit with venlafaxine monotherapy. We examined effect sizes of 39 potential moderators of aripiprazole (vs. placebo) augmentation efficacy using the outcome of percentage reduction in depressive symptom after 12 weeks. We then incorporated information from the individually relevant variables in combined moderators. A larger aripiprazole treatment effect was related to: white race, better physical function, better performance on Trail-Making, attention, immediate, and delayed memory tests, greater psychomotor agitation and suicidality symptoms, and a history of adequate antidepressant pharmacotherapy. A smaller aripiprazole treatment effect was observed in patients with: more pain and more work/activity impairment and libido symptoms. Combining information from race and Trail-Making test performance (base combined moderator (Mb*)) produced a larger effect size (Spearman effect size=0.29 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.15, 0.42)) than any individual moderator. Adding other individually relevant moderators in the full combined moderator (Mf*) further improved effect size (Spearman effect size=0.39 (95% CI: 0.25, 0.52)) and identified a sub-group benefiting more from placebo plus continuation venlafaxine monotherapy than adjunctive aripiprazole. Combining moderators can help clinicians personalize depression treatment. We found the majority of our patients benefited from adjunctive aripiprazole, but a smaller subgroup that is identifiable using clinical measures appeared to benefit more from continuation venlafaxine plus placebo.
机译:对晚期抑郁症进行个性化治疗需要从影响治疗功效的多种因素(主持人)中识别和整合信息。我们使用来自阿立哌唑增强的多地点,随机,安慰剂对照,双盲试验的数据进行了探索性主持人分析。年龄≥60岁的患者(n = 159)患有严重的抑郁症,但文拉法辛单药治疗无法缓解。我们使用12周后抑郁症状减少百分率的结果,检查了39种潜在的阿立哌唑(相对于安慰剂)增强药的疗效。然后,我们将来自各个相关变量的信息合并到组合主持人中。更大的阿立哌唑治疗效果与以下因素有关:白人,更好的身体机能,更先进的制造性能,注意力,即时和延迟的记忆力测试,更大的精神运动性激动和自杀倾向,以及有足够的抗抑郁药物治疗史。在以下患者中观察到阿立哌唑的治疗效果更小:更多疼痛和更多工作/活动障碍和性欲症状。结合种族和越野测试性能(基础组合主持人(Mb *))获得的信息产生的效果大小(斯皮尔曼效果大小= 0.29(95%置信区间(CI):0.15,0.42))比任何单个主持人都要大。在完全联合的主持人(Mf *)中添加其他个体相关的主持人,可以进一步改善疗效大小(Spearman疗效大小= 0.39(95%CI:0.25、0.52)),并确定了一个分组,该分组受益于安慰剂加继续文拉法辛​​单药治疗而不是辅助治疗阿立哌唑。合并主持人可以帮助临床医生个性化抑郁症治疗。我们发现我们的大多数患者都受益于辅助性阿立哌唑,但是使用临床措施可确定的较小亚组似乎从文拉法辛加安慰剂的治疗中受益更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号