...
首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Educational Management >Does learning in statistics get deeper or shallower?
【24h】

Does learning in statistics get deeper or shallower?

机译:统计学习会变得更深或更浅吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - While the natural expectation is that students seek greater depth of learning as they develop intellectually during their studies, some research calls this into question and even suggests that student learning can become shallower from year to year. The present study aims to investigate the relative depth of students' learning at different stages of their undergraduate studies by comparing second-year with third-year students in two statistics units. Design/methodology/approach - A survey was conducted using Biggs's Study Process Questionnaire. The survey results were used to compare second- and third-year groups, as well as to investigate other variables by comparing the performances of: international and domestic students, male and female students, students who worked and those who did not work, and students who intended to register for a higher degree and those who did not. Findings - Significant differences in approaches were found between male and female students; and between students who intended to enrol in a higher degree and those who did not. Research limitations/implications - Characteristics of the learning and teaching environment, including quality of teaching, were not investigated in this study. These and the possibility of students' mixed approaches to learning depending on the unit of study might have significant impact on the results. Additionally, this study is specific to one Sydney university; therefore the results might not be generalisable. Originality/value - The findings from this study provide evidence that there is no significant difference between second and third year; or in international and local students' approaches to learning in statistics.
机译:目的-自然的期望是学生在学习过程中随着智力的发展而寻求更大的学习深度,但一些研究对此提出了质疑,甚至暗示学生的学习会逐年变浅。本研究旨在通过比较两个统计单元中的第二年级和第三年级学生,调查学生在本科学习的不同阶段学习的相对深度。设计/方法/方法-使用Biggs的研究过程问卷进行调查。调查结果用于比较第二年级和第三年级,以及通过比较以下方面的表现来调查其他变量:国际和国内学生,男女学生,工作和不工作的学生以及学生打算报读更高学位的人和没有报读更高学位的人。调查结果-在男女学生之间,方法上存在重大差异;打算攻读更高学位的学生与不打算攻读更高学位的学生之间。研究局限/含意-本研究未研究学与教环境的特征,包括教学质量。这些以及学生根据学习单位采取混合学习方式的可能性可能会对结果产生重大影响。此外,这项研究仅针对一所悉尼大学。因此结果可能无法概括。原创性/价值-这项研究的发现提供了证据,证明第二年和第三年之间没有显着差异;或国际和本地学生的统计学习方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号