...
首页> 外文期刊>Evolutionary Ecology >Is there rapid evolutionary response in introduced populations of tansy ragwort, Jacobaea vulgaris, when exposed to biological control?
【24h】

Is there rapid evolutionary response in introduced populations of tansy ragwort, Jacobaea vulgaris, when exposed to biological control?

机译:暴露于生物控制下的艾菊豚草,雅各布植物的引入种群中是否有快速的进化反应?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Differences in the herbivore community between a plant’s native (specialists and generalists) and introduced range (almost exclusively generalists) may lead to the evolution of reduced allocation to defences against specialist herbivores in the introduced range, allowing for increased allocation to competitive ability and to defences against generalist herbivores. Following this logic, the introduction of biological control agents should reverse this evolutionary shift and select for plants with life-history traits that are more similar to those of plants in the native range than those of plants in the introduced range that have not been exposed to biological control. In a common garden experiment, we compared performance and resistance traits of tansy ragwort, Jacobaea vulgaris, among populations from the introduced range (New Zealand and North America) that have either been exposed to or grown free from the biological control agent Longitarsus jacobaeae. For comparison, we included populations from the native European range. We found lower levels of generalist-deterrent pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) and of soluble phenolics in New Zealand populations with than in populations without exposure to L. jacobaeae, while the opposite pattern was detected among North American populations. Contrary to expectation, populations with exposure to L. jacobaeae revealed more feeding damage by L. jacobaeae than populations without exposure. Introduced populations had higher levels of PAs and reproductive output than native J. vulgaris populations. Jacobaea vulgaris was introduced in different parts of the world some 100–130 years ago, while L. jacobaeae was introduced only some 20–40 years ago. Hence, the larger differences observed between native and introduced populations, as compared to introduced populations with and without biological control history, may result from different time scales available for selection to act.
机译:植物的本地人(专家和通才)与引进的范围(几乎是通才)之间的草食动物群落的差异可能会导致针对引入范围内的专业草食动物的防御分配减少,从而增加了竞争能力和防御的分配反对通才草食动物。按照这种逻辑,生物防治剂的引入应逆转这种进化转变,并选择具有生命历史特征的植物,其与原生范围内的植物相比,与未暴露于该范围内的植物更相似。生物防治。在一个常见的花园实验中,我们比较了艾菊艾草,普通雅各花草的性能和抗性性状,这些生物来自引入范围(新西兰和北美),这些种群已暴露于生物控制剂或不生长于日本龙眼。为了进行比较,我们包括了来自欧洲本土的人群。我们发现在新西兰人群中,具有通用威慑力的吡咯烷核生物碱(PAs)和可溶性酚类化合物的水平低于未接触过美洲乳杆菌的人群,而在北美人群中则发现了相反的模式。与预期相反,暴露于乳酸杆菌的种群显示乳酸杆菌的饲喂损害比没有暴露的种群更多。引入的种群的PAs和生殖输出水平要高于当地的寻常型J. J.种群。普通雅各氏菌在大约100–130年前被引入世界不同地区,而美洲乳杆菌仅在大约20–40年前被引入。因此,与具有和没有生物控制历史的引入种群相比,在本地种群和引入种群之间观察到的较大差异可能是由于可用于选择行动的不同时间尺度造成的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号