...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Special Needs Education >A one-year study of the development of co-teaching in four Finnish schools
【24h】

A one-year study of the development of co-teaching in four Finnish schools

机译:为期四年的芬兰四所学校共同教学发展研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this follow-up study, development of co-teaching was studied in four different schools in Helsinki, Finland. Teachers, altogether 54, 51 and 26, respectively, responded to an electronic questionnaire three times during one year. The attitudes towards co-teaching were positive although the frequency of co-teaching remained low. Co-teaching was seen as a developing mode of teaching and it was said to be suitable for all school subjects. Special teachers and class teachers had the most experience with co-teaching. The majority of respondents co-taught 2-5 lessons per week and that did not change during the follow-up, although monetary incentive was available to those who increased their co-teaching during the study period. For class-teachers, another class-teacher was most often the chosen co-teaching partner. Special teachers were frequent co-teaching partners for all teachers. The most common reason for not co-teaching was the lack of planning time. However, 15 minutes were considered enough to plan one lesson. The respondents had no education about co-teaching. Receiving more attention was the most often mentioned benefit of co-teaching for the students. Sharing and well-being were regarded as the greatest benefits of co-teaching for the teachers. The advantages and obstacles of co-teaching are discussed and some practical advice is given.View full textDownload full textKeywordsco-teaching, Finnish education system, benefits, barriers, team-teachingRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2012.691233
机译:在这项后续研究中,在芬兰赫尔辛基的四所不同学校研究了共同教学的发展。一年中,老师分别对54、51和26名学生进行了3次电子问卷调查。尽管共同教学的频率仍然很低,但对共同教学的态度是积极的。共同教学被视为一种发展的教学模式,据说适合所有学校科目。特殊教师和班主任在共同教学方面经验最丰富。大多数受访者每周共同上课2至5课,尽管在研究期间增加共同教学的人可以获得金钱奖励,但在随访期间并没有改变。对于班主任来说,另一位班主任最常被选为共同教学伙伴​​。特殊教师是所有教师的经常共同教学伙伴​​。不共同教学的最常见原因是缺乏计划时间。但是,认为15分钟足以计划一堂课。受访者没有关于共同教学的知识。受到更多关注是共同教学对学生最常提及的好处。分享和幸福被认为是老师共同学习的最大好处。讨论了共同教学的优点和障碍,并提供了一些实用的建议。查看全文下载全文关键字scosco教学,芬兰的教育体系,好处,障碍,团队教学相关var addthis_config = { ::“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2012.691233

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号