...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Criterion validity of The International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF) for use in clinical practice in patients with osteoarthritis
【24h】

Criterion validity of The International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF) for use in clinical practice in patients with osteoarthritis

机译:国际体力活动问卷的标准有效性 - 短期形式(IPAQ-SF)用于骨关节炎患者的临床实践

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND:To tailor physical activity treatment programs for patients with osteoarthritis, clinicians need valid and feasible measurement tools to evaluate habitual physical activity. The widely used International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF) is not previously validated in patients with osteoarthritis.PURPOSE:To assess the concurrent criterion validity of the IPAQ-SF in patients with osteoarthritis, using an accelerometer as a criterion-method.METHOD:Patients with osteoarthritis (n?=?115) were recruited at The Division of Rheumatology and Research at Diakonhjemmet Hospital (Oslo, Norway). Physical activity was measured by patients wearing an accelerometer (ActiGraph wGT3X-BT) for seven consecutive days, followed by reporting their physical activity for the past 7?days using the IPAQ-SF. Comparison of proportions that fulfilled physical activity recommendations as measured by the two methods were tested by Pearson Chi-Square analysis. Differences in physical activity levels between the IPAQ-SF and the accelerometer were analyzed with Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test and Spearman rank correlation test. Bland-Altman plots were used to visualize the concurrent criterion validity for total- and intensity-specific physical activity levels.RESULTS:In total, 93 patients provided complete physical activity data, mean (SD) age was 65 (8.7) years, 87% were women. According to the IPAQ-SF, 57% of the patients fulfilled the minimum physical activity recommendations compared to 31% according to the accelerometer (p?=?0.043). When comparing the IPAQ-SF to the accelerometer we found significant under-reporting of total physical activity MET-minutes (p?=??0.001), sitting (p?=??0.001) and walking (p??0.001), and significant over-reporting of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (p??0.001). For the different physical activity levels, correlations between the IPAQ-SF and the accelerometer ranged from rho 0.106 to 0.462. The Bland-Altman plots indicated an increased divergence between the two methods with increasing time spent on moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity.CONCLUSION:Physical activity is a core treatment of osteoarthritis. Our finding that patients tend to over-report activity of higher intensity and under-report low-intensity activity and sitting-time is of clinical importance. We conclude that the concurrent criterion validity of the IPAQ-SF was weak in patients with osteoarthritis.
机译:背景:为骨关节炎患者定制身体活动治疗程序,临床医生需要有效和可行的测量工具来评估习惯性身体活动。以前在骨关节炎患者之前验证了广泛使用的国际身体活动问卷形式。方法:患有骨关节炎的患者(n?=?115)被招募在Diakonhjemmet医院的风湿病学和研究司(Oslo,挪威)。通过连续七天佩戴加速度计(Actigraph WGT3X-BT)的患者测量身体活动,然后在过去7日使用IPAQ-SF报告他们的身体活动。通过Pearson Chi-Square分析测试了通过两种方法测量的物理活动建议的比较进行比较。用威尔柯克逊签名 - 秩检验和Spearman等级相关试验分析了IPAQ-SF与加速度计之间的物理活动水平的差异。 Bland-Altman图用于可视化总体和强度特异性身体活动水平的并发标准有效性。结果:总共有93名患者提供完整的身体活动数据,平均值(SD)年龄为65(8.7)年,87%是女性。根据IPAQ-SF,57%的患者满足了最低体力活动的建议,根据加速度计(P?= 0.043)。在将IPAQ-SF与加速度计进行比较时,我们发现显着的估计百分之次物理活动的总物理活动(P?=Δ<0.001),坐着(P?=Δ0.001)和行走(P?&lt。 ;?0.001),显着过于报告中度至剧烈的身体活性(p≤≤0.001)。对于不同的物理活性水平,IPAQ-SF与加速度计之间的相关性从RHO 0.106到0.462。 Bland-Altman曲线表明,两种方法之间的分歧增加了随着中等至剧烈的强度体积致力学的时间增加时间。结论:身体活性是骨关节炎的核心处理。我们发现患者倾向于过度报告更高强度和报告下的低强度活动和随时的临床重要性。我们得出结论,骨关节炎患者的IPAQ-SF的并发标准有效性薄弱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号