首页> 外文期刊>Thoracic cancer. >Treatment with or without bevacizumab as a first‐line and maintenance therapy for advanced non‐squamous non‐small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study
【24h】

Treatment with or without bevacizumab as a first‐line and maintenance therapy for advanced non‐squamous non‐small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study

机译:用或没有Bevacizumab治疗作为先进的非鳞状非小细胞肺癌的一线和维持治疗:回顾性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:Pemetrexed and bevacizumab as monotherapies, or in combination, have been approved for maintenance therapy following platinum-based induction in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The differences in the benefits of bevacizumab for treatment during early or late NSCLC have not yet been characterized.METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed data from 35 patients with advanced na?ve NSCLC who had received pemetrexed/platinum with or without bevacizumab followed by maintenance therapy with pemetrexed alone or pemetrexed plus bevacizumab. The data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression adjusted for risk factors. Patients were grouped according to treatment conditions. Group A received pemetrexed plus platinum followed by pemetrexed alone (Pem-Pt/Pem). Group B received pemetrexed plus platinum followed by pemetrexed and bevacizumab (Group B; Pem-Pt/Pem? ?Bev). Group C received pemetrexed, platinum, and bevacizumab during induction therapy, and pemetrexed as maintenance therapy (Group C; Pem-Pt? ?Bev/Pem? ?Bev). We assessed the significance of introduction of bevacizumab at different stages of treatment.RESULTS:A total of 13 (37.1%) patients were included in Group A, nine patients (25.7%) were included in Group B, and 13 patients (37.1%) were included in Group C. Among the 35 patients, 69.2% were male, and the median age was 59?years (range 40-75). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.7 months (231?days, range 134-410?days) in Group A, 9.3 months (280?days, range 84-565?days) in Group B, and 8.0 months (241?days, range 108-665?days) in Group C. The median PFS was not significantly different among the three groups (P = 0.233). Similarly, bevacizumab did not significantly affect PFS (P = 0.630).CONCLUSIONS:The addition of bevacizumab into induction chemotherapy or maintenance therapy provided limited benefits to PFS in our study, but previous studies suggested that bevacizumab may improve disease control. In that way, we presume that early use of bevacizumab may provide a greater benefit.? 2020 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
机译:背景:在铂族基于非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者患者(NSCLC)患者中,Pemetrexed和Bevacizumab被批准用于维修治疗,或组合。尚未表征贝伐单抗治疗贝伐单抗治疗益处的差异。方法:我们回顾性地分析了35例高级NA ve NSCLC患者的数据,他们接受了有或没有Bevacizumab的Pemetrexed /铂族,然后进行维持治疗单独或培养基加上贝伐单抗。使用Kaplan-Meier方法和COX回归进行分析数据,用于风险因素。患者根据治疗条件进行分组。 A组接受的Pemetrexed Plus铂金,然后单独进行Pemetrexed(PEM-PT / PEM)。 B组接受Pemetrexed Plus铂,其次是Pemetrexed和Bevacizumab(B组; PEM-PT / PEM??BEV)。 C组在感应治疗期间接受培养基,铂和Bevacizumab,并作为维护治疗(C组; PEM-PT??BEV / PEM?BEV)。我们评估了在治疗不同阶段引入贝伐单抗的重要性。结果:A组共用13名(37.1%)患者,九名患者(25.7%)纳入B组,13名患者(37.1%)在C组中包含。在35例患者中,69.2%是男性,中位数为59岁?年(范围40-75)。 A组,9.3个月(280?天,84-565次,84-565次,范围84-565?天),中位进展生存期(PFS)为7.7个月(231个?天,范围为134-410?天),在B组中,8.0个月( C组中241天,范围为108-665?天)。三组中,中位数PFS在三组中没有显着差异(P = 0.233)。同样,Bevacizumab没有显着影响PFS(p = 0.630)。结论:将Bevacizumab添加到感应化疗或维持治疗中为我们的研究提供了有限的益处,但之前的研究表明Bevacizumab可以改善疾病控制。通过这种方式,我们认为早期使用Bevacizumab可能会提供更大的好处。 2020作者。中国肺部肿瘤集团和约翰瓦里和儿子澳大利亚发表的胸癌

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号