...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Laboratory methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis: survey of laboratories in Washington State.
【24h】

Laboratory methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis: survey of laboratories in Washington State.

机译:沙眼衣原体检测的实验室方法:华盛顿州实验室的调查。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The last decade has witnessed the development of a wide variety of diagnostic tests for Chlamydia trachomatis. In order to determine what laboratory methods are being used to detect C. trachomatis infections in Washington State and to identify factors influencing test selection, between April 1995 and October 1995 we conducted a mailed questionnaire survey of all 112 laboratories certified to do chlamydia testing. Of these, 20 had discontinued testing for C. trachomatis, and responses were obtained from 89 (97%) of the remaining 92 laboratories. Surprisingly, 38 (43%) of the 89 laboratories used rapid tests such as Clearview and Surecell, making such tests the most commonly used laboratory tests. Laboratories which used rapid tests had lower test volumes, less experience performing tests for C. trachomatis, less frequent attendance at professional meetings, and greater reliance on manufacturers for information compared with laboratories which used other methods. Confirmation of non-culture-positive results was provided by 28 (34%) of the 82 laboratories doing non-culture-based tests. Forty-one (47%) of 88 laboratories reported having compared their method with another method. Test volume was the strongest predictor of laboratories which confirmed positive non-culture-based test results and which had performed a laboratory comparison of methods. We conclude that rapid tests for C. trachomatis are often being used inappropriately and that efforts are needed to improve effective implementation and quality assurance of laboratory testing for C. trachomatis.
机译:过去十年见证了沙眼衣原体诊断诊断的广泛发展。为了确定在华盛顿州用于检测沙眼衣原体感染的实验室方法并确定影响测试选择的因素,我们在1995年4月至1995年10月之间对所有112个经过认证的衣原体测试实验室进行了邮寄问卷调查。在这些实验室中,有20个已停止测试沙眼衣原体,其余92个实验室中的89个实验室(97%)获得了答复。令人惊讶的是,在89个实验室中,有38个(43%)使用了诸如Clearview和Surecell之类的快速测试,使此类测试成为最常用的实验室测试。与使用其他方法的实验室相比,使用快速测试的实验室的测试量较小,对沙眼衣原体进行测试的经验较少,参加专业会议的频率较低,并且对制造商的信息依赖性更高。在进行基于非文化的测试的82个实验室中,有28个(占34%)对非文化阳性的结果进行了确认。 88个实验室中有41个(47%)报告将其方法与另一种方法进行了比较。测试量是实验室的最强预测指标,该实验室确认了非基于文化的测试结果为阳性,并且对方法进行了实验室比较。我们得出的结论是,沙眼衣原体的快速检测经常被不恰当地使用,并且需要努力改善沙眼衣原体的实验室检测的有效实施和质量保证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号