...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Performance of CHROMagar Selective Medium and Oxacillin Resistance Screening Agar Base for Identifying Staphylococcus aureus and Detecting Methicillin Resistance
【24h】

Performance of CHROMagar Selective Medium and Oxacillin Resistance Screening Agar Base for Identifying Staphylococcus aureus and Detecting Methicillin Resistance

机译:CHROMagar选择性培养基和奥沙西林抗性筛选琼脂基质鉴定金黄色葡萄球菌和检测耐甲氧西林的性能

获取原文
           

摘要

Two new selective media, oxacillin resistance screening agar base (ORSAB) and CHROMagar Staph aureus (CSA), were evaluated for identification of Staphylococcus aureus and for screening of methicillin resistance by addition of antimicrobial agents to these media. A well-defined collection consisting of 1,140 staphylococci was used. A total of 624 were S. aureus, of which 358 were methicillin susceptible and 266 were methicillin resistant, and 516 were coagulase-negative staphylococci. The methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains were selected based on the results of phage typing; 247 different types were included in the analysis. For identification of S. aureus, both media performed better after 24 h than after 48 h. The sensitivities at 24 h were comparable (CSA, 98.6%; ORSAB, 97.1%), but the specificity of CSA was significantly higher (CSA, 97.1%; ORSAB, 92.1%). For screening of methicillin resistance, antibiotic supplements were added to both media. The sensitivity was lower after 24 h (CSA, 58.6%; ORSAB, 84.2%) and increased significantly after 48 h (CSA, 77.5%; ORSAB, 91.4%). At both time intervals ORSAB was significantly more sensitive than CSA. However, the specificities of both media were high after 24 h (CSA, 99.1%; ORSAB, 98.3%) and decreased significantly after 48 h of incubation (CSA, 94.7%; ORSAB, 95.5%). In conclusion, for identification of S. aureus, CSA is more accurate than ORSAB because of a significantly higher specificity. For screening of MRSA, ORSAB performs better than CSA, but the usefulness in clinical practice is limited because a significant number of strains are not detected.
机译:评价了两种新的选择性培养基:奥沙西林抗性筛选琼脂碱(ORSAB)和金黄色葡萄球菌(CROMagar Staph aureus)(CSA),用于鉴定金黄色葡萄球菌(Semphylococcus aureus)和通过在这些培养基中添加抗菌剂来筛选耐甲氧西林。使用了由1140个葡萄球菌组成的明确定义的集合。总共624位是 S。金黄色葡萄球菌,其中358例对甲氧西林敏感,266例对甲氧西林耐药,516例对凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌。耐甲氧西林的 S。根据噬菌体分型结果选择金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)。分析中包括247种不同类型。用于识别 S。金黄色素,两种培养基在24小时后的效果都比48小时好。 24 h的敏感性相当(CSA为98.6%; ORSAB为97.1%),但CSA的特异性明显更高(CSA为97.1%; ORSAB为92.1%)。为了筛选耐甲氧西林,将抗生素补充剂添加到两种培养基中。 24小时后敏感性降低(CSA,58.6%; ORSAB,84.2%),并在48小时后显着提高(CSA,77.5%; ORSAB,91.4%)。在两个时间间隔内,ORSAB均比CSA敏感得多。但是,两种培养基的特异性在24小时后都很高(CSA为99.1%; ORSAB为98.3%),在孵育48 h后则显着下降(CSA为94.7%; ORSAB为95.5%)。总之,用于鉴定 S。相对于ORSAB,金黄色葡萄球菌(CSA)的准确性更高,因为它的特异性更高。对于MRSA的筛选,ORSAB的性能优于CSA,但由于未检测到大量菌株,因此在临床实践中的实用性受到限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号