...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Misinformation from sputum cultures without microscopic examination.
【24h】

Misinformation from sputum cultures without microscopic examination.

机译:痰培养中的错误信息,未经显微镜检查。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Only 13 of 38 hospital laboratories surveyed include a Gram stain routinely in microbiological sputum examination. In a prospective three-hospital study, 60% of over 1,200 "sputum" specimens consisted predominantly of saliva, as judged by cell composition. Compared with the results of cultures in which microorganisms presumptively identified on sputum smears were specifically sought ("directed cultures"), cultures of the same specimens processed in the routine manner missed pneumococci 61%, haemophili 23%, and yeasts 44% of the time. The findings were similar in all three hospitals despite differences in administration, staffing, primary culture media, and workload. Unless microscopic examination is routinely included, half of all microbiological information rendered on sputum specimens is meaningless and subject to dangerous misapplication. Furthermore, culture must be guided by microscopic findings, or respiratory pathogens will frequently be missed. Finally, when routine culture and smear disagree, the culture cannot be assumed to be correct. Microscopic examination should be mandatory in sputum microbiology, both for specimen evaluation and as a guide to what to look for in culture.
机译:在接受调查的38个医院实验室中,只有13个实验室在微生物痰液检查中例行了革兰氏染色。在一项前瞻性三医院研究中,根据细胞组成判断,超过1200个“痰”标本中有60%主要由唾液组成。与专门寻找在痰涂片上推测出的微生物的培养结果(“定向培养”)相比,以常规方式处理的同一标本的培养中,肺炎球菌的检出率为61%,血友病的检出率为23%,酵母菌的检出率为44%。 。尽管在管理,人员配备,主要文化媒体和工作量方面存在差异,但三家医院的调查结果相似。除非常规进行显微镜检查,否则痰标本上提供的所有微生物学信息中有一半是毫无意义的,可能会导致误用。此外,培养必须以微观发现为指导,否则呼吸道病原体将经常被遗漏。最后,当常规文化和涂片意见不一致时,就不能认为该文化是正确的。痰微生物学中必须进行显微镜检查,以便进行标本评估以及指导在培养物中寻找什么。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号