...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization >Human Right and Conflict of Custom in Bali (The Case of “Caste Status” Change Caused Kesepakang in Bungaya Traditional Village of Karangasem)
【24h】

Human Right and Conflict of Custom in Bali (The Case of “Caste Status” Change Caused Kesepakang in Bungaya Traditional Village of Karangasem)

机译:巴厘岛的人权与风俗习惯冲突(以“ Caste Status”变更为例,导致在Karangasem的Bungaya传统村落的Kesepakang)

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The State is responsible for protecting human rights of various aspects of life. Bali with its values of local wisdom cannot be avoided from conflicts which at the beginning was an individual conflict of Balinese with traditional village leading to violations against human rights.This article studies the human rights and custom conflicts in Bali (the case "caste status” change resulted in Kesepekang in Bungaya Traditional Village of Karangasem). This study focuses on two main points, namely, (1) finding human right instruments underlying the behavior of people in Bungaya Village, (2) what are the responsibilities of Bungaya Traditional Village to residents changing their caste status in the Traditional Village related to the enforcement of human rights?This study uses socio-legal research in combination with research methods of cultural studies to find out local cultural values ??that can trigger the sanction of kesepekang .The results of this study explained that the Law of Human Rights in Bungaya Traditional Village has been ruled out by Custom Officers ( Prajuru Adat ). The traditional case of Kesepekang is a social sanction for indigenous residents who violate the change of "caste status". The Traditional Village Officers of Bungaya perceived that values ??or commandment belief / fatwa Kebayan Wayan is an absolute truth, therefore it can sentence to Kesepekang for the village members in the event of custom violation.
机译:国家负责保护生活各个方面的人权。巴厘岛具有当地智慧的价值观无法避免,因为冲突一开始是巴厘岛人与传统村庄的个人冲突,导致侵犯人权。本文研究了巴厘岛的人权和习俗冲突(“ caste status”案)变化导致了Karangasem的Bungaya传统村的Kesepekang)。本研究着重于两个主要方面,即(1)寻找Bungaya村人民行为背后的人权工具,(2)Bungaya传统村对居民的责任是什么?居民在与人权实施有关的传统村落中改变其种姓地位?本研究结合社会法律研究与文化研究方法,找出可以触发对Kespekang制裁的当地文化价值。结果该研究的解释是,海关官员排除了邦加亚传统村落的人权法(Prajuru阿达(Adat)。 Kesepekang的传统案例是对违反“种姓身份”变更的土著居民的社会制裁。 Bungaya的传统村官认为,价值观或戒律信仰/法特瓦·基巴扬·瓦扬是绝对的真理,因此,如果发生习惯违法,它可以判处Kesepekang为村民。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号