...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain Physician >Sonographic Guidance for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks: Single vs. Double Injection Cluster Approach
【24h】

Sonographic Guidance for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks: Single vs. Double Injection Cluster Approach

机译:锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞的超声引导:单次注射与双次注射簇方法

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The cluster approach for supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SC-BPB) can be easily performed but may result in asymmetric local anesthetic (LA) spread. The authors hypothesized that the use of a cluster approach in each of the 2 planes would achieve better 3-dimensional LA distribution than the traditional single cluster approach.OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to compare a double injection (DI) in 2 planes (one injection in each plane) with the traditional single injection (SI) cluster approach for ultrasound-guided SC-BPB. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center. METHODS: In the SI group (n = 18), 30 mL of LA was injected into the main neural cluster after penetrating the brachial plexus sheath laterally. In the DI group (n = 18), the needle penetrated the sheath in a downward direction at the first skin puncture, and 15 mL of LA was injected, and at the second skin puncture (behind the initial puncture site), the needle penetrated the sheath in an upward direction, and 15 mL was again injected. Ultrasound-guided SC-BPB was evaluated from immediately after the block every 5 minutes to 30 minutes by sensory and motor testing. The main outcome variables were procedural time; onset time (time for complete sensory and motor block of the median, radial, ulnar, and musculocutaneous nerves); and rate of blockage of all 4 nerves. RESULTS: Procedure times (medians [interquartile range]) were similar in the DI and SI groups (5.5 [4.75 – 8] vs. 5 [4 – 7] minutes, respectively; P = 0.137). Block onset time in the DI group was not significantly different from that in the SI group (10 [5 – 17.5] vs. 20 [6.25 – 30] minutes, P = 0.142). However, the rate of blockage of all 4 nerves was significantly higher in the DI group (94% vs. 67%, P = 0.035). LIMITATIONS: Although the results of this study indicate LA distribution in the DI group was more evenly spread within brachial plexus sheaths than in the SI group, this was not confirmed by ultrasonography or contrast radiography. CONCLUSION: The DI approach can be performed easily as single cluster approach and increases the consistency of ultrasound-guided SC-BPB over the SI approach in terms of the rate of blocking of all 4 nerves. Key words: Brachial plexus block, corner pocket approach, cluster approach, multiple injection, supraclavicular block, ultrasound
机译:背景:锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞(SC-BPB)的群集方法可以很容易地执行,但可能会导致不对称的局麻药(LA)扩散。作者假设在两个平面中的每个平面上使用聚类方法将比传统的单聚类方法获得更好的3维LA分布。目的:本研究的目的是比较2个平面中的双重注入(DI)超声引导的SC-BPB采用传统的单次注射(SI)群集方法进行飞机(每个飞机一次注射)。研究设计:一项随机对照试验。单位:嘉川大学吉尔医学中心麻醉与疼痛医学系。方法:在SI组(n = 18)中,侧臂穿透臂丛神经鞘后,将30 mL LA注射入主神经团。在DI组(n = 18)中,在第一次皮肤穿刺时,针头沿向下方向刺入护套,并注射15 mL的LA,在第二次皮肤穿刺(在初始穿刺点后),针头刺入向上鞘,再次注入15 mL。超声引导下的SC-BPB从阻滞后每5分钟到30分钟通过感觉和运动测试进行评估。主要的结果变量是手术时间。发作时间(完全正中、,神经,尺神经和肌肉皮肤神经感觉和运动阻滞的时间);和所有4条神经的阻塞率。结果:DI组和SI组的手术时间(中位[四分位间距])相似(分别为5.5 [4.75 – 8]分钟和5 [4 – 7]分钟; P = 0.137)。 DI组的阻滞发作时间与SI组的阻滞发作时间没有显着差异(10 [5 – 17.5]分钟对20 [6.25 – 30]分钟,P = 0.142)。但是,DI组中所有4条神经的阻塞率均显着更高(94%比67%,P = 0.035)。局限性:尽管这项研究的结果表明,DI组的LA分布比SI组更均匀地分布在臂丛神经鞘内,但超声检查或造影X线摄影并未证实这一点。结论:DI方法可以像单簇方法一样容易地执行,并且在所有4条神经的阻塞率方面,与SI方法相比,超声引导的SC-BPB的一致性更高。关键词:臂丛神经阻滞,角袋入路,丛集入路,多次注射,锁骨上锁,超声

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号