...
首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrics and Gynecology International >Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Total Laparoscopic and Robotically Assisted Hysterectomy for Benign Pathology during Introduction of a Robotic Program
【24h】

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Total Laparoscopic and Robotically Assisted Hysterectomy for Benign Pathology during Introduction of a Robotic Program

机译:腹腔镜手术和机器人辅助子宫切除术对良性病理的围手术期效果比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Study Objective. Prospectively compare outcomes of robotically assisted and laparoscopic hysterectomy in the process of implementing a new robotic program.Design. Prospectively comparative observational nonrandomized study.Design Classification. II-1.Setting. Tertiary caregiver university hospital.Patients. Data collected consecutively 24 months, 34 patients underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy, 25 patients underwent robotic hysterectomy, and 11 patients underwent vaginal hysterectomy at our institution.Interventions. Outcomes of robotically assisted, laparoscopic, and vaginal complex hysterectomies performed by a single surgeon for noncancerous indications.Measurements and Main Results. Operative times were208.3±59.01minutes for laparoscopic,286.2±82.87minutes for robotic, and163.5±61.89minutes for vaginal (P<.0001). Estimated blood loss for patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery was242.7±211.37 cc,137.4±107.50 cc for robotic surgery, and243.2±127.52 cc for vaginal surgery (P=0.05). The mean length of stay ranged from 1.8 to 2.3 days for the 3 methods. Association was significant for uterine weight (P=0.0043) among surgery methods.Conclusion. Robotically assisted hysterectomy is feasible with low morbidity, a shorter hospital stay, and less blood loss. This suggests that robotic assistance facilitates a minimally invasive approach for patients with larger uterine size even during implementing a new robotic program.
机译:研究目标。在实施新的机器人程序的过程中,前瞻性地比较了机器人辅助和腹腔镜子宫切除术的结果。前瞻性比较观察性非随机研究。设计分类。 II-1。设置。三级护理大学医院患者。连续24个月收集的数据,在我们的机构中​​,有34例接受了腹腔镜子宫切除术,有25例接受了机器人子宫切除术,还有11例接受了阴道子宫切除术。由一名外科医生针对非癌性适应症进行的机器人辅助,腹腔镜和阴道复杂子宫切除术的结果。测量和主要结果。腹腔镜手术时间为208.3±59.01分钟,机器人手术时间为286.2±82.87分钟,阴道手术时间为163.5±61.89分钟(P <.0001)。估计腹腔镜手术患者的失血量为机器人手术为242.7±211.37 cc,机器人手术为137.4±107.50 cc,阴道手术为243.2±127.52 cc(P = 0.05)。 3种方法的平均住院时间为1.8至2.3天。在各种手术方法中,子宫重量的相关性显着(P = 0.0043)。机器人辅助子宫切除术是可行的,它具有较低的发病率,较短的住院时间和较少的失血量。这表明即使在实施新的机器人程序期间,机器人辅助也可为子宫较大的患者提供一种微创方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号