...
首页> 外文期刊>Nutrition and Dietary Supplements >Nutritional support and dietary interventions following esophagectomy: challenges and solutions
【24h】

Nutritional support and dietary interventions following esophagectomy: challenges and solutions

机译:食管切除术后的营养支持和饮食干预:挑战和解决方案

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background and aims: Provision of adequate nutrition after esophagectomy remains a major challenge. The aims of this review were to describe the challenges facing this patient population and to determine the evidence base underpinning current nutritional and dietetic interventions after esophagectomy. Methods: Medline, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched for English language publications of the period 1990–2016 reporting on the outcome of nutritional or dietetic interventions after esophagectomy or patient-related symptoms. Results: Four studies demonstrated that early reintroduction of oral fluids was safe and was associated with a shorter hospital stay and ileus duration. One of three studies comparing in-hospital enteral nutrition against usual care showed that enteral feeding was well tolerated and was associated with a shorter hospital stay. Eight studies comparing enteral with parenteral nutrition showed similar surgical complication rates. Enteral feeding was associated with a shorter duration of ileus and lower health care costs. In hospital, all types of enteral access (nasoenteral, jejunostomy) were equivalent in their safety profiles. Cohort studies indicate that technical (tube dysfunction) and feed (diarrhea, distention) problems were common with jejunostomies but are easily managed. The mortality risk associated with jejunostomy in hospital is 0.2% (reported range 0%–1%), principally due to small bowel ischemia. There have been no reports of serious jejunostomy complications in patients receiving home feeding. One study demonstrated the advantages of home feeding in weight, muscle and fat preservation. Studies reporting 12 months or more after esophagectomy indicate a high frequency of persistent symptoms, dumping syndrome 15%–75% (median 46%), dysphagia 11%–38% (median 27%), early satiety 40%–90% (median 65%) and reflux 19%–61% (median 29%). Conclusion: Patients should resume oral intake as soon as possible after surgery. In hospital, all forms of enteral access appear to be safe. Out of hospital, the ability to provide home feeding by feeding jejunostomy is likely where meaningful nutritional improvements can be made. Improving nutrition and related quality of life in the early months might improve the long-term outcome.
机译:背景和目的:食管切除术后提供足够的营养仍然是一个主要挑战。这篇综述的目的是描述该患者人群所面临的挑战,并确定食管切除术后当前营养和饮食干预的基础。方法:在Medline,Embase和CINAHL数据库中搜索1990-2016年间英语出版物,这些出版物报道了食管切除术或患者相关症状后的营养或饮食干预措施的结果。结果:四项研究表明,尽早重新引入口服液是安全的,并且与住院时间缩短和肠梗阻持续时间有关。将医院内肠内营养与常规护理进行比较的三项研究之一表明,肠内喂养耐受性良好,并且住院时间较短。八项将肠内营养与肠胃外营养进行比较的研究显示出相似的手术并发症发生率。肠内喂养与较短的肠梗阻持续时间和较低的医疗保健费用有关。在医院中,所有类型的肠道通路(鼻肠,空肠造口术)的安全性均相同。队列研究表明,空肠切除术常见技术性(管功能障碍)和进食(腹泻,膨胀)问题,但易于管理。医院进行空肠造口术的死亡风险为0.2%(报告范围为0%–1%),主要是由于小肠缺血引起的。尚无接受家庭喂养的患者发生严重空肠造口并发症的报道。一项研究证明了家庭喂养在体重,肌肉和脂肪保存方面的优势。食管切除术后12个月或更长时间的研究表明,持续症状的发生频率很高,倾倒综合征为15%–75%(中位数46%),吞咽困难11%–38%(中位数27%),早期饱腹感40%–90%(中位数) 65%)和返流19%–61%(中位数29%)。结论:患者应在手术后尽快恢复口服。在医院中,所有形式的肠通路似乎都是安全的。在医院外,通过空肠造口术提供家庭喂养的能力很可能会改善营养。在最初的几个月中改善营养和相关生活质量可能会改善长期结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号