...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Brain and Cognitive Sciences >Candidate Biomarkers and CSF Profiles for Alzheimer’s Disease and CADASIL
【24h】

Candidate Biomarkers and CSF Profiles for Alzheimer’s Disease and CADASIL

机译:阿尔茨海默氏病和CADASIL的候选生物标志物和CSF概况

获取原文
           

摘要

The differential diagnosis between Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD) are still roughly problematic in clinical practice, despite the widely used diagnostic criteria to differentiate between the two disorders. There is an increasing evidence that cerebrovascular dysfunction plays a role not only in vascular causes of cognitive alterations but also in AD. Cognitively patients, with AD, show sometimes mixed degrees of associated vascular lesions in 30-60% of AD cases. In opposition, AD pathology may be present in 40%-80% of VaD patients, thus impeding diagnosis accuracy. Therefore, to eliminate this bewilderment and discrepancies in the diagnosis between the AD and VaD, it is worthy to shed light firstly on a disease that is a microangiopathy and represents VaD with clear milestones and features as is the case of cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL). Studying CADASIL CSF biomarkers profile, will help in the differential diagnosis between both diseases sharing the coexisting neurodegeneration, furthermore, CADASIL is a dominantly inherited mid-adult life disorder causing ischemic strokes, which belongs to vasculopathies and symbolizes a genuine prototype of VaD that provides a valuable opportunity for studying its CSF biomarkers. Secondly, examining and evaluating the CSF biomarkers of AD compared to that of CADASIL. The pathogenesis similarities between CADASIL and early onset AD affecting the small vessels of the brain have suggested plausible molecular mechanisms involved in vascular damage and their impact on brain function and also come from the fact that in both diseases genetic mutations occur. CADASIL mutations in NOTCH3 gene generate toxic protein aggregates (Granular Osmiophilic Material- GOM) in the vicinity of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) causing degeneration and loss of VSMCs in small arteries and arterioles of white matter regions of the brain that lead to dementia, similar to those attributed to mutant forms of the Amyloid Precursor proteins (APP) and presenilins genes who cause overproduction and accumulations of the toxic Aβ42 protein in the brain and collapse of Aβ42 clearance mechanisms in AD. Despite the presumed pathological similarities, substantial differences between the two phenomena may exist especially in the CSF neurochemical phenotypes. To examine this aspect, which may help in the differential diagnosis, we carried out this review.
机译:尽管广泛使用了诊断标准来区分两种疾病,但阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)和血管性痴呆(VaD)的鉴别诊断在临床实践中仍然存在很大问题。越来越多的证据表明,脑血管功能障碍不仅在认知改变的血管原因中起作用,而且在AD中也起作用。患有AD的认知患者在30-60%的AD病例中有时表现出混合程度的相关血管病变。相反,AD病理可能存在于40%-80%的VaD患者中,因此妨碍了诊断的准确性。因此,为消除AD和VaD诊断之间的困惑和差异,首先应阐明一种微血管病变且代表具有明确里程碑和特征的VaD的疾病,如脑常染色体显性遗传性动脉粥样硬化伴皮质下病变梗塞和白质脑病(CADASIL)。研究CADASIL CSF生物标志物谱,将有助于在共享共存神经变性的两种疾病之间进行鉴别诊断,此外,CADASIL是一种导致遗传性中风的遗传性中成年生命疾病,属于血管性病变,象征着VaD的真正原型。研究其CSF生物标志物的宝贵机会。其次,检查和评估AD的CSF生物标志物与CADASIL的生物标志物。 CADASIL和AD的早期发作影响大脑的小血管之间的发病机理相似性表明,可能的分子机制参与了血管损伤及其对脑功能的影响,并且还来自在两种疾病中均发生基因突变的事实。 NOTCH3基因中的CADASIL突变会在血管平滑肌细胞(VSMC)附近生成有毒蛋白质聚集物(粒状渗透性物质-GOM),导致大脑白质区小动脉和小动脉中VSMC变性和丧失,从而导致痴呆,类似于那些归因于淀粉样前体蛋白(APP)和早老蛋白基因突变形式的基因,后者导致大脑中有毒Aβ42蛋白的过量产生和积累,并导致AD中Aβ42清除机制的崩溃。尽管假定的病理相似性,但两种现象之间可能存在实质性差异,尤其是在CSF神经化学表型中。为了检查这方面的内容,这可能有助于鉴别诊断,我们进行了此项综述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号