...
首页> 外文期刊>BioMedical Engineering OnLine >Modified less invasive anterior subcutaneous fixator for unstable Tile-C-pelvic ring fractures: a biomechanical study
【24h】

Modified less invasive anterior subcutaneous fixator for unstable Tile-C-pelvic ring fractures: a biomechanical study

机译:改良的微创前路皮下固定器用于不稳定的Tile-C骨盆环骨折:生物力学研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Operative procedures for unstable pelvic ring fractures remain controversially discussed. Minimally invasive treatment options for pelvic ring fractures have several benefits for the patient. But they can also provide disadvantages. Anterior subcutaneous pelvic fixation (INFIX) has shown promising biomechanical results in pelvic ring fractures, but there is a high complication rate of nerve injuries. An additional screw to the INFIX seems to be more stable. The aim of this study is to compare biomechanical stability of a new modified unilateral INFIX fixing the unilateral injured pelvic ring with the standard INFIX. 24 composite synthetic full pelvises were used in this study. 4 groups each with a number of six pelvic specimens were randomly assigned. A C1.3-type pelvic fracture was made with an osteotomy of the sacrum and an osteotomy of the anterior pelvic ring. Fracture fixation was performed within the four groups: (1) unilateral INFIX, (2) “extended” unilateral INFIX?+?additional pubic ramus pedicle screw, (3) bilateral INFIX, (4) “extended” bilateral INFIX?+?additional pubic ramus pedicle screw. All specimens were cyclic loaded with 200?N until maximum of 300?N. Distance/dislocation of the fracture fragments were detected with 3D-ultrasound measuring system. Stiffness was calculated. Extended unilateral INFIX showed the lowest mean dislocation. Lowest rotational stability was displayed by the standard bilateral INFIX. A significant difference (P?=?0.04) was shown between the extended unilateral INFIX and the “standard” bilateral INFIX in terms of rotational stability. Extended unilateral INFIX showed significantly improved stability of anterior fracture dislocation (P?=?0.01) and unilateral INFIX showed the highest rotational stiffness. Anterior fixation stiffness of the unilateral INFIX was significantly improved using an additional symphysis/pubic ramus screw (P?=?0.002). Extended unilateral INFIX (+?additional pubic ramus pedicle screw) is a feasible minimally invasive treatment for anterior pelvic ring fractures. Higher stability and lower probability of bilateral nerve damage is provided by the extended unilateral INFIX compared to the standard bilateral INFIX.
机译:不稳定的盆腔环骨折的手术方法仍存在争议。骨盆环骨折的微创治疗选择对患者有很多好处。但是它们也会带来不利条件。皮下前骨盆固定术(INFIX)在骨盆环骨折中显示出令人鼓舞的生物力学结果,但神经损伤的并发症发生率很高。 INFIX的附加螺钉似乎更稳定。这项研究的目的是比较一种新的改良单侧INFIX与标准INFIX固定单侧受伤骨盆环的生物力学稳定性。在这项研究中使用了24个合成的合成全骨盆。随机分配4组,每组6个骨盆标本。用1.3骨截骨术和前骨盆环截骨术治疗C1.3型骨盆骨折。在四组中进行骨折固定:(1)单侧INFIX,(2)“延伸”单侧INFIX?+附加耻骨椎弓根螺钉,(3)双侧INFIX,(4)“扩展”双侧INFIX?+附加耻骨支蒂蒂螺钉。所有样品都循环加载200?N,直到最大300?N。用3D超声测量系统检测骨折片段的距离/错位。计算刚度。扩展的单侧INFIX显示最低的平均位错。标准双边INFIX显示出最低的旋转稳定性。在旋转稳定性方面,在扩展的单侧INFIX和“标准”双侧INFIX之间显示出显着差异(P≤0.04)。扩展的单侧INFIX表现出前骨折脱位的稳定性显着改善(P <= 0.01),单侧INFIX表现出最高的旋转刚度。使用附加的耻骨联合/耻骨耻骨螺钉,单侧INFIX的前固定刚度得到了显着改善(P≤0.002)。扩大的单侧INFIX(+耻骨椎弓根螺钉)是一种可行的微创治疗骨盆前环骨折的方法。与标准的双侧INFIX相比,扩展的单侧INFIX可提供更高的稳定性和更低的双侧神经损伤可能性。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号