首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR >Comparison between the Analgesic Effect of two Techniques on the Level of Pain Perception During venipuncture in Children up to 7 Years of Age: A Quasi-Experimental Study
【2h】

Comparison between the Analgesic Effect of two Techniques on the Level of Pain Perception During venipuncture in Children up to 7 Years of Age: A Quasi-Experimental Study

机译:两种技术对7岁以下儿童静脉穿刺过程中疼痛知觉水平的镇痛效果比较:一项准实验研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Distraction techniques are often provided by nurses, parents or child life specialists and help in pain alleviation during procedures. The use of non pharmacological procedures to cope with pain behaviour is less costly and most of these procedures can be administered by a nurse. Hence, the aim of the present study was to assess and compare the analgesic effect of holding the child by a family member versus holding the child by a family member along with an animation distraction intervention on the level of pain perception during venipuncture in children up to seven years of age.>Materials and Methods: Purposive sampling technique was used to select 70 children admitted in paediatric ward of Guru Gobind Singh Medical Hospital, Faridkot, 35 children in each group viz. Group 1(child held by family member during venipuncture) and Group 2 (child held by family member along with an animation distraction during venipuncture) and video clippings were made for each subject in both groups. Standardized FLACC pain scale was used to assess the level of pain during venipuncture by seeing the video clips of procedure in both groups.>Results: Findings revealed that the mean pain score of Group 1 was 3.86 and that of Group 2 was 2.43. Findings revealed that in Group 1 majority 31(88.57%) got severe pain and none remained relaxed during venipuncture whereas in Group 2 majority 10(28.58%) got moderate pain, 09(25.71%) remained relaxed and only 07(20%) got severe pain. The comparison of mean pain score of both groups was checked statistically by computing independent t-test and the value of t comes out to be 7.199 with p-value 0.000*** which was found to be highly significant.>Conclusion: The study concluded that when during painful procedures like venipuncture if children are given any non-pharmacological intervention like animated distraction along with their family member it helps in managing the pain. In other words, it distracts/diverts the child’s attention from pain and results in better cooperation of child during procedure.
机译:>背景:分心技术通常由护士,父母或儿童生活专家提供,有助于缓解手术过程中的疼痛。使用非药理学方法来应对疼痛行为的成本较低,并且这些方法中的大多数都可以由护士进行管理。因此,本研究的目的是评估和比较由家庭成员抱抱孩子与由家庭成员抱抱孩子以及动画分心干预对镇静直至儿童静脉穿刺期间疼痛知觉水平的镇痛效果。 >材料与方法:采用目的抽样技术,选择了Faridkot的Guru Gobind Singh医院儿科病房收治的70名儿童,每组35名儿童。对两组中的每个受试者进行第一组(静脉穿刺时由家庭成员抱住的孩子)和第二组(静脉穿刺时由家庭成员抱住的孩子以及动画分散注意力)和视频剪辑。通过查看两组程序视频,使用标准化的FLACC疼痛量表评估静脉穿刺过程中的疼痛程度。>结果:结果显示,第1组的平均疼痛评分为3.86,而第1组的平均疼痛评分为2为2.43。研究发现,在第1组中,多数31(88.57%)出现严重疼痛,在静脉穿刺过程中没有人保持放松;而在第2组中,大多数10(28.58%)出现中度疼痛,有09(25.71%)保持放松,只有07(20%)严重的疼痛。通过计算独立的t检验对两组的平均疼痛评分进行比较,统计得出t值为7.199,p值为0.000 ***,具有很高的显着性。>结论:< / strong>研究得出的结论是,在进行诸如静脉穿刺之类的痛苦手术过程中,如果对儿童进行任何非药物干预,例如与家人一起进行动画分散注意力,则有助于缓解疼痛。换句话说,它可以分散孩子的注意力,使他们的注意力从痛苦中转移出来,从而使孩子在手术过程中更好地合作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号