首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Are High-Impact Species Predictable? An Analysis of Naturalised Grasses in Northern Australia
【2h】

Are High-Impact Species Predictable? An Analysis of Naturalised Grasses in Northern Australia

机译:高影响物种是否可预测?澳大利亚北部归化草的分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Predicting which species are likely to cause serious impacts in the future is crucial for targeting management efforts, but the characteristics of such species remain largely unconfirmed. We use data and expert opinion on tropical and subtropical grasses naturalised in Australia since European settlement to identify naturalised and high-impact species and subsequently to test whether high-impact species are predictable. High-impact species for the three main affected sectors (environment, pastoral and agriculture) were determined by assessing evidence against pre-defined criteria. Twenty-one of the 155 naturalised species (14%) were classified as high-impact, including four that affected more than one sector. High-impact species were more likely to have faster spread rates (regions invaded per decade) and to be semi-aquatic. Spread rate was best explained by whether species had been actively spread (as pasture), and time since naturalisation, but may not be explanatory as it was tightly correlated with range size and incidence rate. Giving more weight to minimising the chance of overlooking high-impact species, a priority for biosecurity, meant a wider range of predictors was required to identify high-impact species, and the predictive power of the models was reduced. By-sector analysis of predictors of high impact species was limited by their relative rarity, but showed sector differences, including to the universal predictors (spread rate and habitat) and life history. Furthermore, species causing high impact to agriculture have changed in the past 10 years with changes in farming practice, highlighting the importance of context in determining impact. A rationale for invasion ecology is to improve the prediction and response to future threats. Although our study identifies some universal predictors, it suggests improved prediction will require a far greater emphasis on impact rather than invasiveness, and will need to account for the individual circumstances of affected sectors and the relative rarity of high-impact species.
机译:预测将来可能会造成严重影响的物种对于目标管理工作至关重要,但是此类物种的特征在很大程度上仍未得到证实。自欧洲定居以来,我们使用有关在澳大利亚归化的热带和亚热带草的数据和专家意见,以识别归化和高影响力的物种,然后测试高影响力物种是否可预测。通过根据预定标准评估证据,确定了三个主要受影响部门(环境,牧业和农业)的高影响物种。 155种归化物种中有21种(14%)被列为高影响力物种,其中有4种对一个以上领域产生了影响。具有高影响力的物种更可能具有更快的扩散速度(每十年入侵的区域),并且是半水生的。传播速度最好用物种是否已被主动传播(作为牧场)和自入世以来的时间来最好地解释,但由于它与范围大小和发生率紧密相关,因此可能无法解释。给予更大的权重以最大程度地减少俯瞰高影响物种的机会,这是生物安全的优先事项,这意味着需要更多的预测因子来识别高影响物种,并且降低了模型的预测能力。高影响物种预测因子的按行业分析受其相对稀少性的限制,但显示出行业差异,包括普遍预测因子(传播率和栖息地)和生活史。此外,在过去的十年中,随着农业实践的改变,对农业产生重大影响的物种也发生了变化,突显了环境在确定影响方面的重要性。入侵生态学的基本原理是改善对未来威胁的预测和响应。尽管我们的研究确定了一些普遍的预测因素,但它表明改进的预测将需要更加重视影响而不是侵入性,并且需要考虑受影响部门的个别情况和高影响物种的相对稀有性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号