首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Medicina >Development of an Adapted Model for Decision-Making to Improve Reasoning and Risk Assessment in an Emergency Team: A Prospective Simulation Study
【2h】

Development of an Adapted Model for Decision-Making to Improve Reasoning and Risk Assessment in an Emergency Team: A Prospective Simulation Study

机译:开发改进的决策模型以改善应急团队的推理和风险评估:前瞻性仿真研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background and Objectives: Medical staff is rarely trained in structured decision-making, relying instead on intuition without due consideration for the associated pros and cons. Materials and Methods: We adopted a model for decision-making to improve reasoning and risk assessment and carried out a prospective simulation study using paramedic students in a three-year training program. We conducted a training session in which participants were lectured on decision-making using the FAR-BEK model (German abbreviation for facts, alternatives, risks, competence, decision, control), physiological processes in decision-making under stress, as well as medico-legal aspects for the comprehension and justification of medical decisions. We analyzed pre- and post-training scenarios to elucidate the influence of training on decision-making. Results: Twenty paramedic students, with a mean age of 22.0 ± 1.7 years, took part in the study. The question of whether decision aids can be applied, initially affirmed by 40% of participants, rose to 71.4% (p = 0.011) following our training. Confidence in decision-making increased on a 7-point Likert scale from 4.5 to 4.8 points (p < 0.394). The reasoning behind the decisions rose from 5.3 to 5.6 points (p < 0.081). Indication, options, and risks rose significantly, from 5.4 to 6.1 points (p = 0.045). Overall, our simulation training significantly increased the points of decision support taken into account (57.8% vs. 88.9%, p < 0.001). Viewed individually, the largest increase of 180% was seen in risk assessment (33.3% vs. 93.3%, p < 0.002). The second largest increase of 150% was seen in the question of one’s own permissions (26.7% vs. 66.7%, p < 0.066). Also, the control increased (40.0% vs. 86.7%, p < 0.021). Conclusions: With a brief training course, both the awareness and the implementation of a structured decision-making model in paramedic students can be significantly increased. Nevertheless, no definitive conclusions can be made with respect to the implementation of real patient care. The application of structured, standardized decision-making tools may need to be further consolidated in routine medical use.
机译:背景和目标:医务人员很少接受结构化决策方面的培训,而是依靠直觉,而没有适当考虑相关的利弊。资料和方法:我们采用了决策模型来改善推理和风险评估,并在为期三年的培训计划中使用护理人员进行了前瞻性模拟研究。我们进行了一次培训课程,向参加者讲授有关使用FAR-BEK模型(事实,替代方法,风险,能力,决策,控制的德国缩写),压力下决策的生理过程以及药物的决策-理解和证明医疗决定的法律方面。我们分析了培训前后的情况,以阐明培训对决策的影响。结果:20名平均年龄为22.0±1.7岁的护理人员参加了这项研究。经过培训后,最初得到40%参与者确认的是否可以使用决策辅助工具的问题上升到71.4%(p = 0.011)。决策信心在李克特(Likert)7分制下从4.5分升至4.8分(p <0.394)。做出决定的理由从5.3分上升到5.6分(p <0.081)。指示,选择和风险从5.4点大幅上升至6.1点(p = 0.045)。总体而言,我们的模拟培训显着提高了所考虑的决策支持点(57.8%对88.9%,p <0.001)。单独查看,风险评估的增幅最大,为180%(33.3%对93.3%,p <0.002)。 150%的第二大增长来自个人权限问题(分别为26.7%和66.7%,p <0.066)。同样,对照也增加了(40.0%对86.7%,p <0.021)。结论:通过简短的培训课程,可以显着提高护理人员对结构化决策模型的认识和实施。但是,对于实施真正的患者护理尚无定论。在常规医疗用途中,可能需要进一步巩固结构化,标准化的决策工具的应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号