现当代的《左传》研究仍然是从清末持续到20世纪初的经今古文之争基础上展开的，而“刘歆伪作说”的论争则是研究的核心问题。民国时期，主要以《左传》真伪问题为中心，并由此延伸到对该书的性质、作者及成书年代等基本问题的讨论。建国前30年，随着经学研究的边缘化，学界逐渐展开对《左传》文史之争的讨论，且大多数学者认为其是史书。文革后，《左传》研究的核心由文史之争逐渐转变为经史之争并达到了一个高潮。1980年代以后，在研究方法上体现出“走出疑古时代”的倾向，一些出土文献如马王堆帛书《春秋事语》等受到学者关注。新世纪以来，学术思想更加多元，研究角度愈发细腻，《左传》文学文化研究亦更趋热闹。%The modern and contemporary studies on Zuo Zhuan are still a continuation of the disputes arising at the turn of the 20 th century and in particular of that about whether the book was the pseu-donymous work of Liu Xin or not. During the period of the Republic of China,the focus was on the authenticity of Zuo Zhuan,and then was extended to the discussion of such basic issues of the book as its genre,authorship and time of production. During the 30 years before the founding of PRC,due to the marginalization of the classics,the academic circle gradually entered into the discussion about whether this Chinese classic was a literary work or a history book and most scholars regarded it as a historical work. After the Cultural Revolution,the core issue of the study on Zuo Zhuan turned into whether it was a Confucian classic or a historical work. After 1980,the research method showed a tendency of“transcending the ancient era”and at the same time some of the excavated documents such as Mawangdui Chunqiu Shiyu caught the attention of scholars. Since the beginning of the new century,academic thoughts have become more diverse,and the research perspectives more rigorous and thorough. The literary and cultural researches on Zuo Zhuan have also become increasingly vigor-ous.
展开▼
