知识产权侵权损害赔偿：问题与反思

摘要

我国知识产权损害赔偿制度中的三种计算方式有先后次序的规定。然而，实际损害一般难以证明，侵权人获利在我国现实背景下计算结果较低，许可使用费受到先后次序的限制难以适用。通过对比较法的研究，建议我国侵权损害赔偿突破计算方法适用的先后次序，以充分保障权利人利益。此外，我国法定赔偿制度也存在一些问题，首先是法定赔偿与“损害”赔偿制度之间界限不明，建议司法者在适用我国的法定赔偿制度时明确法定赔偿与损害赔偿之间的区分；其次是法定赔偿制度的规定过于模糊，建议我国参照美国版权法与商标法的经验，对现行法定赔偿制度进行细化规定。%The three methods to calculate IPR damages in our country are listed according to their respective importance. However, the actual damages are difficult to measure. The infringement profits are often underestimated in current China. License fees are not applicable due to restrictions of priority in damages calculation methods. Through comparative studies, it is advisable to abandon the priority in adopting damages calculation method in deciding damages, so as to fully protect right owners. Moreover, to distinguish statutory damages from (compensation for) damages, and to reifne current statutory damages system referring to related stipulations in US Copyright Law and Trademark Law.