目的：观察毫火针与温针灸配合康复训练对恢复肱骨外上髁炎患者肘功能的效果。方法肱骨外上髁炎患者90例随机分成2组，分别接受毫火针和温针灸治疗，均同时配合康复训练。观察临床疗效、肘功能评定量表总分及项目分变化。结果毫火针组临床疗效优于温针灸组(P<0.05)。肘功能量表总分两组间无显著性差异，但治疗后2周和4周，毫火针组症状体征评分高于温针灸组(P<0.05)。治疗后2周，温针灸组日常生活评分高于毫火针组(P<0.05)。结论毫火针与温针灸在改善患者肘功能方面效果相当，毫火针改善症状体征方面较优，而温针灸能短期内改善患者日常生活活动能力。%Objective To compare the effects of filiform-fire needle and warming needle on rehabilitation of lateral epicondylitis. Meth-ods 90 patients with lateral epicondylitis were randomized into 2 groups to receive filiform-fire needle and warming needle treatment respec-tively based on rehabilitation training. Their clinical efficacy, total and item scores of Elbow Functional Scale were compared. Results The clinical efficacy was better in the filiform-fire needle group than in the warming needle group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the total scores of Elbow Functional Scale between 2 groups. However, the scores of symptoms and signs improved more in the infiliform-fire needle group 2 and 4 weeks after the treatment (P<0.05), while the scores of daily living improved more in the warming needle group 2 weeks after treatment (P<0.05). Conclusion Both filiform-fire needle and warming needle could recover the elbow function of lateral epi-condylitis patients based on the rehabilitation training. The former is advanced in relieving symptoms and signs, while the latter is in improv-ing daily living in short time.
展开▼
