首页> 外文学位 >The Effect of Note-Taking Style on Student Achievement: Guided Notes Versus Concept Mapping With a Guided Notes Review.
【24h】

The Effect of Note-Taking Style on Student Achievement: Guided Notes Versus Concept Mapping With a Guided Notes Review.

机译:笔记风格对学生成绩的影响:指导笔记与概念图和指导笔记复习。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This mixed-method study was an investigation of two note-taking styles, guided notes alone and concept mapping with a guided notes review, in order to compare their effectiveness. The investigation involved two groups of students, the control group and the experimental group. The control group was taught using guided notes alone. The experimental group was taught using concept mapping with a guided notes review and then surveyed regarding preferences toward styles. The students' post-exam scores and overall percentages were analyzed by running separate paired t-tests, combined paired t-tests, and one-way ANOVAs to determine if note-taking style impacts academic achievement. Analysis of the results indicated that the range of scores decreased when students were taught using concept mapping with a guided notes review. The minimum scores of the lower- achieving students increased while the higher-achieving students maintained their maximum scores. The students' surveys, however, offered mixed results. The majority of the participants indicated that they preferred using guided notes alone. A few students indicated that they saw benefits from helping to create the notes and concept maps and then reviewing with the guided notes. More research using more data sets and larger comparison groups should be conducted to validate these results. Guided notes alone can be beneficial to some students; however, if teachers opt to use concept mapping with a guided notes review, they may discover that more of their students are successful. It is also recommended that teachers investigate this practice with younger students. The earlier students are asked to ascertain facts for themselves and learn to record their own notes, the more successful they may be in their learning.
机译:这项混合方法的研究是对两种笔记方式的研究,即单独的指导笔记和带有指导笔记审查的概念图,以比较其有效性。调查涉及两组学生,对照组和实验组。对照组仅使用指导性笔记进行教学。实验小组使用概念图和指导性注释复习进行教学,然后调查对样式的偏好。通过运行单独的配对t检验,组合配对t检验和单向方差分析来分析学生的考试后分数和总体百分比,以确定记笔记方式是否会影响学业成绩。结果分析表明,使用概念图和指导性注释复习教给学生时,分数范围减小。成绩较低的学生的最低分数增加,而成绩较高的学生则保持最高分数。但是,学生的调查结果却好坏参半。大多数参与者表示,他们更喜欢单独使用指导性笔记。一些学生表示,他们从帮助创建便笺和概念图,然后阅读指导性便笺中受益匪浅。应该使用更多的数据集和更大的比较组进行更多的研究,以验证这些结果。单独的指导性注释可能对某些学生有帮助;但是,如果教师选择在指导性的笔记复习中使用概念图,他们可能会发现更多的学生是成功的。还建议教师与年轻学生一起调查这种做法。要求学生越早确定自己的事实并学会记录自己的笔记,他们的学习就会越成功。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Missouri Baptist University.;

  • 授予单位 Missouri Baptist University.;
  • 学科 Education Leadership.;Education Secondary.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 105 p.
  • 总页数 105
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号