首页> 外文会议>World of Coal Ash Conference >Coal Ash Constituents in Groundwater and Regulation Under the Clean Water Act
【24h】

Coal Ash Constituents in Groundwater and Regulation Under the Clean Water Act

机译:水下水法下的地下水和监管中的煤灰成分

获取原文

摘要

Background/Objectives. Should the Clean Water Act (CWA) regulate discharges to groundwater? It’s a matter of significant debate. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), CWA permits for discharges to groundwater may be required if pollutants from point sources to jurisdictional surface waters that occur via groundwater or other subsurface flow have a direct hydrologic connection to the surface water. As such, EPA has stated that determinations are fact-specific, leading courts to rule on both sides of the issue. On February 20, 2018, EPA issued a request for comment on the technical elements of the matter and whether the agency should consider clarification or revision of previous statements. As administrators of the CWA’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program, some states oppose permitting groundwater discharges under the CWA. Officials from those states contend that such permitting contorts the law, creates unnecessary challenges, and could undermine states’ abilities to regulate groundwater contamination through other programs already in place. Historic disposal of coal ash in unlined earthen impoundments or landfills presents a situation in which permitting discharges to groundwater could apply. Approach/Activities. When impounded surface water overlying coal ash infiltrates the subsurface and encounters natural groundwater, coal ash constituents can migrate to jurisdictional surface water bodies, sometimes 'daylighting' as a seep on a stream or river bank or upwelling through sediments. Coal ash constituents dissolved in groundwater can be conservative (unreactive with soil or native groundwater) or reactive, which means migration and attenuation are influenced by adsorption-desorption, cation exchange, precipitation-dissolution, or oxidation-reduction processes, often making transient or seasonal seeps challenging to characterize. Coal ash impoundments are subject to cleanup under the 2015 federal Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) rule. Results/Lessons Learned. Mandated closure of coal ash impoundments includes removal of ash and overlying water and capping ash in place. It is anticipated that those activities will substantially reduce or eliminate seeps. In the interim, an option may be to permit constructed seeps, such as toe drains, as NPDES outfalls. Non-constructed seeps, by contrast, are challenging if not inappropriate to permit because of inconsistent flows and characteristics. Non-constructed seeps are seasonal and transient in nature, and may or may not have direct hydrologic connection to surface water. In those cases, non-constructed seeps may be addressed outside of NPDES through consent agreements, compliance monitoring, and corrective action.
机译:背景/目标。如果清洁水法案(CWA)调节排放到地下水?这是显著一个见仁见智的问题。据美国环境保护署(EPA),CWA允许对排放到地下水,如果从点源通过地下水或其他潜流发生管辖地表水污染物有地表水的直接水文连接可能是必需的。因此,环保署指出,决定是事实具体,导致法院在这个问题上双方统治。在2018年2月20,EPA发布了关于此事,是否该机构应考虑以前的声明澄清或者修改的技术要素的置评请求。作为CWA的国家污染物排放的管理员消除系统(NPDES)方案,一些国家反对允许CWA下地下水的排放。从这些国家的官员争辩说,这种允许扭曲了法律,造成不必要的挑战,并可能破坏国家的能力,以通过其他程序已经到位调节地下水污染。单衣土蓄水或垃圾填埋场的礼物,其中允许排放到地下水的可能应用情况历史处置煤灰。接近角/活动。当蓄水地表水覆粉煤灰渗入地下并遭遇自然地下水,煤灰成分可以迁移到管辖地表水体,有时“日光”作为一个流或河岸或通过沉积物上涌一渗漏。溶解在地下水煤灰成分可以是保守的(与土壤或天然地下水不反应)或反应性的,该装置的迁移和衰减由吸附,解吸,离子交换,沉淀,溶解,或氧化还原过程的影响,往往使瞬时的或季节性渗透有挑战性的表征。粉煤灰蓄水池须根据2015年联邦煤燃烧残差(CCR)规则清理。结果/经验教训。煤灰蓄水池的规定封盖包括去除灰和覆水和封盖灰到位。预计这些活动将大大减少或消除渗漏。在此期间,一种选择可以是允许构建渗漏,例如脚尖排水沟,如NPDES排水口。非构造渗漏,相反,是如果不恰当的,因为不一致流动和特性的,以允许具有挑战性。非构造渗漏是季节性和短暂性的,并且可以或可以不具有到地表水直接水文连接。在这种情况下,非构造渗漏可以通过同意协议,合规性监控和纠正行动加以解决NPDES之外。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号