首页> 外文会议>Conference on Microelectronic Yield, Reliability, and Advanced Packaging, Nov 28-30, 2000, Singapore >Comprehensive Methodology for Integrated Circuit In-line Defect Classification
【24h】

Comprehensive Methodology for Integrated Circuit In-line Defect Classification

机译:集成电路在线缺陷分类的综合方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The earliest attempts by human inspectors to classify defects found during in-line inspection of integrated circuits were fraught with difficulties in clarifying defect definitions and in training a diverse and changing inspector staff. These deficiencies were exacerbated by the challenges of expanding classification categories as new defects were discovered. Our diversified product mix had accumulated a knowledge base of approximately seventy defect types, posing a formidable learning challenge for even the most knowledgeable inspector. Not surprisingly, the average accuracy of the group in classifying defects was ~55%, and even the best inspector scored around 70%. To address these issues, we developed a comprehensive methodology for classifying defects. This methodology includes both word descriptions of the physical appearance of defects and a hierachical questionnaire leading to precise defect classification. After adopting this methodology and implementing strong training programs, our team significantly improved its defect review process, ultimately reaching ~80% classification accuracy. With this degree of accuracy, we were able to implement defect specific statistical process control (SPC) charts, together with formalized "decision tree" procedures for correcting defect excursions. These formalisms then became an effective part of the fab's yield improvement program. Today, as technology advances into the realm of automatic defect classification (ADC), the lessons learned from human defect inspection form a strong foundation by establishing a comprehensive set of defect categories uniquely related to causality and supporting defect identification standards that can be used by the entire community of ADC training engineers.
机译:人工检查人员对集成电路在线检查中发现的缺陷进行分类的最早尝试是在澄清缺陷定义和培训多样化且不断变化的检查人员方面遇到困难。随着发现新缺陷,扩展分类类别的挑战加剧了这些缺陷。我们多元化的产品组合积累了大约70种缺陷类型的知识库,即使是最有知识的检查员也构成了艰巨的学习挑战。不足为奇的是,该组对缺陷进行分类的平均准确度约为55%,甚至最佳检查员的评分也约为70%。为了解决这些问题,我们开发了一种用于分类缺陷的综合方法。该方法既包括对缺陷物理外观的文字描述,也包括导致精确缺陷分类的分层问卷。在采用这种方法并实施了强大的培训计划之后,我们的团队大大改善了缺陷检查流程,最终使分类精度达到了约80%。以这种精确度,我们能够实施缺陷特定的统计过程控制(SPC)图,以及用于纠正缺陷偏移的正式“决策树”程序。然后,这些形式主义成为工厂成品率提高计划的有效部分。如今,随着技术进入自动缺陷分类(ADC)领域,从人类缺陷检查中汲取的教训通过建立一套全面的与因果关系唯一的缺陷类别并支持可用于缺陷识别的标准,从而奠定了坚实的基础。 ADC培训工程师的整个社区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号